Differentiability of a Complex Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function \( f:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow\mathbb{C} \) defined as \( f(z)=\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z} \) for \( z \neq 0 \) and \( f(0)=0 \) is shown to be not differentiable at \( z=0 \) despite satisfying the Cauchy-Riemann equations at that point. The limit \( \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0} \) does not exist as it varies with the angle \( \theta \) when expressed in polar coordinates. Specifically, the limit yields different values depending on the direction from which \( z \) approaches zero, confirming the non-differentiability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their differentiability
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates in complex analysis
  • Ability to compute limits in the context of complex variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations on differentiability in complex analysis
  • Learn about the polar form of complex numbers and its applications in limits
  • Explore examples of functions that are continuous but not differentiable
  • Investigate the concept of multi-variable functions and their differentiability criteria
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as educators looking to clarify the concepts of differentiability and the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

shen07
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
$$ f:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}
\\
f(z)=\left\{\begin{array} \frac{(\bar{z})^2}/ {z} \quad z\neq0 \\
0 \quad z=0
\end{array}
\right.$$

Show that f is differentiable at z=0, but the Cauchy Riemann Equations hold at z=0.

Well i have tried to start the first part but i am stuck, could you please help me out.

WORKING:
f is diff at z=0

if $$ \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0}\; exists\\
\lim_{z\to0}\frac{ \frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z}-0}{z-0}=
\lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}

$$

Now we get indeterminate form in the limit but how can we differentiate $$\bar{z}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shen07 said:
$$ f:\mathbb{C}\rightarrow\mathbb{C}
\\
f(z)=\left\{\begin{array} \frac{(\bar{z})^2}/ {z} \quad z\neq0 \\
0 \quad z=0
\end{array}
\right.$$

Show that f is not differentiable at z=0, but the Cauchy Riemann Equations hold at z=0.

Well i have tried to start the first part but i am stuck, could you please help me out.

WORKING:
f is diff at z=0

if $$ \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0}\; exists\\
\lim_{z\to0}\frac{ \frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z}-0}{z-0}=
\lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}

$$

Now we get indeterminate form in the limit but how can we differentiate $$\bar{z}$$
There is an important word missing from the statement of the problem. The result should say that f is not differentiable at 0, despite satisfying the C–R equations at that point.

You have correctly shown that the condition for f to be differentiable at 0 is that $$ \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0} = \lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}$$ should exist. To see that the limit does not in fact exist, use the polar form $z = re^{i\theta}$, so that $\bar{z} = re^{-i\theta}$. You should find that the limit as $r\to0$ varies for different values of $\theta$, and is thus not uniquely defined.

To see that the C–R equations hold at 0, write $z=x+iy$, $\bar{z} = x-iy$ and find the partial derivatives of $f(x,y)$ at the origin.
 
Opalg said:
There is an important word missing from the statement of the problem. The result should say that f is not differentiable at 0, despite satisfying the C–R equations at that point.

You have correctly shown that the condition for f to be differentiable at 0 is that $$ \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0} = \lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}$$ should exist. To see that the limit does not in fact exist, use the polar form $z = re^{i\theta}$, so that $\bar{z} = re^{-i\theta}$. You should find that the limit as $r\to0$ varies for different values of $\theta$, and is thus not uniquely defined.

To see that the C–R equations hold at 0, write $z=x+iy$, $\bar{z} = x-iy$ and find the partial derivatives of $f(x,y)$ at the origin.
Well you are right i just miss the not,

$$ \lim_{z \to 0} \frac{f(z)-f(0)}{z-0} = \lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}$$
now using $z = re^{i\theta}$
$$ \lim_{z\to0}\frac{(\bar{z})^2}{z^2}=\lim_{r\to0} \frac{(re^{-i\theta})^2}{(re^{i\theta})^2}

$$
now the r's cancel out, i didn't understand what you tried to tell me, Could you Clarify Please.
 
If $\theta = 0$ then

$\displaystyle \frac{e^{-i2\theta}}{e^{i2\theta}} = 1$

If $\theta = \frac{\pi}{4}$ then

$\displaystyle \frac{e^{-i2\theta}}{e^{i2\theta}} = \frac{1}{e^{i\pi}} = -1$.

These values are independent of $r$ (as you noted, the $r$'s cancel).

What is your conclusion?
 
Deveno said:
If $\theta = 0$ then

$\displaystyle \frac{e^{-i2\theta}}{e^{i2\theta}} = 1$

If $\theta = \frac{\pi}{4}$ then

$\displaystyle \frac{e^{-i2\theta}}{e^{i2\theta}} = \frac{1}{e^{i\pi}} = -1$.

These values are independent of $r$ (as you noted, the $r$'s cancel).

What is your conclusion?

Since $\theta$ varies, the function is not continuous at z=0 hence Not Differentiable. Right?

MultiVariable Function? is it?
 
Last edited:
If the limit DID exist, we should be able to choose $r > 0$ such that on a disk centered at the origin with radius $r$, the quantity:

$\displaystyle \frac{(re^{-i\theta})^2}{(re^{i\theta})^2}$ is always within $\epsilon$ of the limit, for ANY $\epsilon > 0$.

What happens if we choose $0 < \epsilon < 1$? Will ANY $r > 0$ work?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K