Differentiable Automorphisms of ℂ

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alexfloo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Differentiable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Nontrivial differentiable automorphisms of the complex numbers ℂ do not exist beyond the identity and complex conjugation. The discussion highlights that any automorphism must fix the rationals Q, leading to the conclusion that continuous automorphisms also fix the reals R. Consequently, the only continuous automorphisms of ℂ are the identity and complex conjugation, with the latter being non-differentiable. The necessity of the Axiom of Choice (AC) is mentioned in the context of constructing discontinuous automorphisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with automorphisms in algebra
  • Knowledge of the Axiom of Choice (AC) in set theory
  • Basic concepts of continuity and differentiability in analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Axiom of Choice on mathematical structures
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions on the reals
  • Learn about biholomorphic mappings and their characteristics
  • Investigate the relationship between automorphisms and field extensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra, analysis, and set theory, will benefit from this discussion on the limitations of differentiable automorphisms in complex analysis.

alexfloo
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Are there any nontrivial differentiable automorphism of the complex numbers? I know there are many automorphisms, but I could only find one article that discussed them. I didn't read the entire thing, but it mentioned that AC is often necessary to construct them, but I didn't see whether it said that was always the case.

Obviously, there's the identity; and then there's the conjugate which is trivial and continuous but of course not differentiable. My intuition is that any others would have to be pretty crazy, possibly not even integrable, but I haven't been able to prove that. Any insights?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alexfloo said:
Are there any nontrivial differentiable automorphism of the complex numbers? I know there are many automorphisms, but I could only find one article that discussed them. I didn't read the entire thing, but it mentioned that AC is often necessary to construct them, but I didn't see whether it said that was always the case.

Obviously, there's the identity; and then there's the conjugate which is trivial and continuous but of course not differentiable. My intuition is that any others would have to be pretty crazy, possibly not even integrable, but I haven't been able to prove that. Any insights?

Did you see this article?

http://mathdl.maa.org/images/upload_library/22/Ford/PaulBYale.pdf

It's a very readable analysis of complex automorphisms. His theorem 4 says that any complex automorphism other than the identity and complex conjugation must be discontinuous.

(edit)
It occurs to me that there's an easy proof. Any automorphism f must fix the rationals Q. That's because f(1) = 1 and so for any natural n, f(n) = f(1 + ... + 1) = n*f(1) = n.

And n*f(1/n) = f(1/n) + ... + f(1/n) = f(1/n + ... + 1/n) [n-times] = f(n/n) = f(1) = 1. So f(1/n) = 1/n.

Then for m/n rational we have f(m/n) = f(1/n + ... + 1/n) [m times] = m*f(1/n) = m/n.

So f fixes the rationals. Any continuous function on the reals is determined by what it does to the rationals, so if f is continuous it fixes the reals. But the only complex automorphisms that fix the reals are the identity and conjugation. So those are the only possible continuous automorphisms, and the rest (given by AC) are discontinuous.

ps better throw in f(-1) = -1 so you can get to the negative rationals. f(-1)*f(-1) = f(1) = 1 so f(-1) must be either 1 or -1. But f(1) = 1 and f is injective so f(-1) must be -1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are none besides the identity. To see this, note that an automorphism of C will fix Q. So a continuous automorphism of C will fix R (because Q is dense in R), and consequently will be either the identity or complex conjugation. And only the former is (complex) differentiable.

An alternative way to see this is to note that any differentiable automorphism of the plane is in particular a biholomorphism C->C so must be of the form z->az+b for some a,b in C with a nonzero (a cute exercise). The only such map that's a ring homomorphism is the one with a=1 and b=0 (another cute exercise).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K