Differential equation with cross product

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a second-order differential equation involving a position vector and a cross product with a constant vector, specifically in the context of electron motion in a magnetic field. Participants explore methods for separating variables, rewriting the equation, and potential approaches to solving it.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to handle the equation, questioning whether to separate it into x and y components.
  • Another participant suggests rewriting the equation as a system of differential equations using matrix representation, mentioning the possibility of eigen-vector decomposition if coefficients are constant.
  • A participant speculates that the vector B may represent a magnetic field and comments on the choice of units.
  • There is a discussion about integrating the derived equation and whether the integration step proposed by a friend is correct.
  • Questions arise about whether B is constant or varies with x and y.
  • One participant proposes differentiating the first equation again to derive a third-order equation, suggesting a substitution method to simplify the problem.
  • Another participant confirms that B is constant, which influences the approach to solving the equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method to solve the differential equation. There are multiple approaches suggested, and some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of specific integration steps.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equation represents electron motion in a magnetic field, but there are unresolved questions about the nature of B and its implications for the solution methods discussed.

alsey42147
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
ok, i don't know what to do with something like this:

(d^2R/dt^2 ) + (dR/dt) x B = 0

where the capitals are vectors (sorry i suck at latex). R is a position vector in x-y plane and B is in the z-direction.

do i split this into equations for x and y directions separately and solve them? for x-direction i would get

d^2x/dt^2 + (dy/dt)|B| = 0

but how do i solve this? I'm pretty sure all the DEs I've ever solved had, for example, d^2x/dt^2 and dx/dt in them, but not d^2x/dt^2 and dy/dt.

or is there a quick way of doing it without having to expand the cross product?

any help would be well appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a SYSTEM of differential equations that you can rewrite as:
\frac{d\vec{U}}{dt}=A\vec{U}, \vec{U}=\frac{d\vec{R}}{dt}
and A is a matrix.
If A has constant coefficients, then the system is readily solvable with eigen-vector decomposition.

Question:
Did you get this equation from a physical problem with a Coriolis term?
Just curious..

EDIT:
Insofar as B is constant, you may gain two decoupled 3.order diff.eq's in R (i.e 2.order in U).
 
Last edited:
Maybe \vec{B} is the magnetic field and he chose units such as q=1...
 
damn, i wish i was more proficient with matrices and stuff. i might have to do a bit of quick revision.

the equation is just electron motion in a magnetic field without the constants.

my friend says that from the equation

d^2x/dt^2 + (dy/dt)|B| = 0

you just integrate to get

dx/dt + y|B| = constant

that doesn't seem quite right to me...is it? if it is that's all i need for now.
 
Is B a constant, or a function of x and y?
 
alsey42147 said:
ok, i don't know what to do with something like this:

(d^2R/dt^2 ) + (dR/dt) x B = 0

where the capitals are vectors (sorry i suck at latex). R is a position vector in x-y plane and B is in the z-direction.

do i split this into equations for x and y directions separately and solve them? for x-direction i would get

d^2x/dt^2 + (dy/dt)|B| = 0

but how do i solve this? I'm pretty sure all the DEs I've ever solved had, for example, d^2x/dt^2 and dx/dt in them, but not d^2x/dt^2 and dy/dt.

or is there a quick way of doing it without having to expand the cross product?

any help would be well appreciated!
Yes, writing R as <x, y, 0> you get
\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+ B\frac{dy}{dt}= 0
and
\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}- B\frac{dx}{dt}= 0[/itex]<br /> <br /> You can, as Arildno suggested, introduce u= \frac{dx}{dt} and v= \frac{dy}{dt} and write this as a system of 4 first order differential equations.<br /> <br /> Another way to handle it is this: differentiate the first equation again to get<br /> \frac{d^3x}{dt^3}+ B\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}= 0[/itex]&lt;br /&gt; and use the second equation to substitute for the second derivative of y&lt;br /&gt; \frac{d^3x}{dt^3}+ B^2\frac{dx}{dt}= 0&lt;br /&gt; That&amp;#039;s easy to solve.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Once you know x(t), you can use the first equation to solve for \frac{dy}{dt} and integrate once more to find y(t).&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; (I just noticed J77&amp;#039;s comment. I am assuming here that B is a constant.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
awesome, thanks. and yes B is constant.
 
alsey42147 said:
damn, i wish i was more proficient with matrices and stuff. i might have to do a bit of quick revision.

the equation is just electron motion in a magnetic field without the constants.

my friend says that from the equation

d^2x/dt^2 + (dy/dt)|B| = 0

you just integrate to get

dx/dt + y|B| = constant

that doesn't seem quite right to me...is it? if it is that's all i need for now.

You can certainly use your friend's trick in the case of constant B. It doesn't help you an overly lot, though, compared to other techniques mentioned.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K