Differential equations and equilibrium points

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving differential equations and identifying equilibrium points for the system defined by the equations \(\dot{x}=y\) and \(\dot{y}=x^{3}-x\). The equilibrium points identified are (0,0), (1,0), and (-1,0). The confusion arises regarding the use of the Jacobian matrix for stability analysis, as opposed to a direct matrix representation of the system. It is clarified that the Jacobian should be evaluated at the equilibrium points to determine stability through linearization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with equilibrium points in dynamical systems
  • Knowledge of Jacobian matrices and their role in stability analysis
  • Experience with Taylor series expansions for linear approximations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of linearization of nonlinear systems around equilibrium points
  • Learn how to compute the Jacobian matrix for systems of differential equations
  • Explore stability analysis techniques using eigenvalues of the Jacobian
  • Review Taylor series and their applications in approximating functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are dealing with dynamical systems and require a deeper understanding of equilibrium points and stability analysis in differential equations.

kidsmoker
Messages
85
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/4873/46343978.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a) is simple enough, i get

\dot{x}=y
\dot{y}=x^{3}-x.

Equilibrium points occur when the time-derivatives of both x and y are zero, which gives the 3 equilibrium points (0,0), (1,0) and (-1,0).

Now I thought i'd better write it as a matrix equation as this is how i remember doing these type of problems, so if we write

X=\begin{pmatrix}x \\ y \end{pmatrix} then

\dot{X}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ x^{2}-1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}X

(sorry, you have to look closely to see where the dots are!).

I would have thought i'd then have to find the eigenvales of this matrix for each of my equilibrium points to find the stability of each one? But when I look at the solution, it uses the Jacobian matrix and finds the eigenvalues of that instead?! I'm confused!

Thanks for any help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can really do what you did, because x is now both in the vector X and in the coefficient matrix.

IIRC the idea is usually that you linearize the equation around the equilibrium points. So you make a first-order Taylor series around the equilibrium point. The constant term will simply be the equilibrium point itself, and the first order term (which gives the information about the stability) will be the Jacobian multiplied by a vector. Try working it out for yourself.
 
Ah okay thanks. I'll have a go.
 
You can't write the two equations as a matrix equaiton because it is not linear. What you can do is approximate it at each point of interest (in particular, the equilibrium points) as a linear problem. You should remember that when you approximate a function, at a point, by a linear function you are using the tangent line approximation so that the slope is the derivative.

That is what is happening here. To get a linear equation \dot{X}= Ax, A is the "derivative", that is, the Jacobian you mention, evaluated at each equilibrium point.

By the way, the derivative of x^3- x is [math]3x^2- 1[/math], not [math]x^2- 1[/math]!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
836
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K