Diffrence between resolving vector to components and find projections

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mohmmad Maaitah
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Components Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between resolving a vector into components and finding projections onto axes. Resolving a vector, such as ##\vec w##, into components ##\vec u## and ##\vec v## results in the equation ##\vec w = \vec u + \vec v##, where the components are only projections if ##\vec u## and ##\vec v## are orthogonal. In contrast, the projection of one vector onto another is solely dependent on those two vectors and remains unaffected by additional vectors. This difference is crucial for understanding vector decomposition in physics and engineering applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with the dot product and its applications
  • Knowledge of orthogonal vectors and their properties
  • Basic concepts of vector resolution in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal vectors and their significance in vector resolution
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of the dot product in vector projections
  • Explore applications of vector resolution in physics, particularly in mechanics
  • Investigate advanced vector decomposition techniques in higher dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, engineers, and anyone involved in vector analysis or mechanics who seeks to deepen their understanding of vector resolution and projections.

Mohmmad Maaitah
Messages
90
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
Resolve to components / Determine magnitude of projections
Relevant Equations
Dot product
I don't get what is the difference when I am asked to re-solve components and find projections to axes other than the Y and X
I know that the parallelogram works for the first one and the dot product for the second but what's the diffrence!
IMG_20230917_143410_282.jpg
1694950414012.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mohmmad Maaitah said:
Homework Statement: Resolve to components / Determine magnitude of projections
Relevant Equations: Dot product

I don't get what is the difference when I am asked to re-solve components and find projections to axes other than the Y and X
I know that the parallelogram works for the first one and the dot product for the second but what's the diffrence!
View attachment 332081View attachment 332082
If you resolve a vector ##\vec w## into components ##\vec u, \vec v## then ##\vec w=\vec u+\vec v##.
Those components will only be the projections of ##\vec w## onto ##\hat u, \hat v## if ##\vec u## and ##\vec v## are orthogonal.

Writing ##\vec u=u\hat u## etc. and ##\lambda=\hat u\cdot\hat v##,
##\vec w=u\hat u+v\hat v##
##\vec w\cdot\hat u=u+v\lambda##
etc., whence
##v=\frac{\vec w\cdot\hat v-\vec w\cdot\hat u\lambda}{1-\lambda^2}##.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
If you resolve a vector ##\vec w## into components ##\vec u, \vec v## then ##\vec w=\vec u+\vec v##.
Those components will only be the projections of ##\vec w## onto ##\hat u, \hat v## if ##\vec u## and ##\vec v## are orthogonal.

Writing ##\vec u=u\hat u## etc. and ##\lambda=\hat u\cdot\hat v##,
##\vec w=u\hat u+v\hat v##
##\vec w\cdot\hat u=u+v\lambda##
etc., whence
I still don't get the diffrence between projection and force component.
 
Mohmmad Maaitah said:
I still don't get the diffrence between projection and force component.
The projection of one vector on another depends only on those two vectors. It is unaffected by any other vectors under consideration.
If you are resolving into components then you need a set of directions to resolve into, ##\hat u_i##, and the coefficient to use in one direction depends on the whole set of directions. If you modify ##\hat u_1## then you may find the magnitude of the component in the ##\hat u_2## direction changes.
 
I get it thank you sir!
haruspex said:
The projection of one vector on another depends only on those two vectors. It is unaffected by any other vectors under consideration.
If you are resolving into components then you need a set of directions to resolve into, ##\hat u_i##, and the coefficient to use in one direction depends on the whole set of directions. If you modify ##\hat u_1## then you may find the magnitude of the component in the ##\hat u_2## direction changes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
780
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K