Dilemma: I want to be a physicist, but I'm mediocre in classical mechanics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a student's struggle with classical mechanics while excelling in mathematics and chemistry. The participant expresses a desire to pursue advanced topics like quantum mechanics and string theory but questions their suitability for a physics career due to difficulties with introductory Newtonian mechanics. Experienced contributors advise the student to continue their studies, emphasizing that classical mechanics is often taught in a fragmented manner and that a deeper understanding will emerge in advanced courses such as Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of introductory Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with calculus concepts
  • Basic knowledge of general chemistry
  • Awareness of advanced physics topics like quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics for a more mathematical approach
  • Study Electromagnetism to gain insights into mathematical physics
  • Review advanced calculus topics relevant to physics
  • Investigate the foundations of quantum mechanics and string theory
USEFUL FOR

Students considering a physics career, particularly those struggling with classical mechanics, as well as educators and mentors guiding aspiring physicists.

brynn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone.

I'm having a little crisis here. I'm really really good in math (I'm doing calculus right now, and it's a breeze), but classical mechanics are giving me a hard time. I'm also doing general chemistry right now and I find it fun and easy as well. Basically, the more abstract something is, the better I understand it.

And I wanted to study more abstract subjects such as quantum mechanics, or string theory. Seeing as classical mechanics does not come as naturally to me as math, I was wondering if I should pursue this career.

Thanks.

Edit: I haven't done optics and electricity yet.
Edit 2: I do have good grades, As, but it doesn't come to me naturally.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From your post, I'm assuming you're a freshman in college. At that level, you haven't been exposed to any more advanced topics in anything, so it's really hard to say what you're "good" at and what you're "bad" at. Calculus is usually a cake walk for physicists, so be careful about saying that you're really really good at math. Wait until you're get to at least the intermediate courses before you decide what your strengths and weaknesses are.

In my experience, elementary physics courses seldom make sense because you are only taught bits and pieces of things and are usually told "here's a problem; here's an equation to solve that problem". You can't fully understand where anything comes from because that would require a higher level of math than you have.
 
From reading your post I get the sense that you are a first year undergraduate, about to finish his/her first semester. So what I would say is that you are not learning "Classical Mechanics" but rather introductory Newtonian Mechanics, which in my opinion was always more or less a class on physical intuition. You might enjoy Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism taught in more advanced Mechanics courses rather than Newtonian, which is much more mathematical in its approach to solving problems and less "seeing" forces.

I would suggest waiting until after Electromagnetism before making your decision, you will find it much more mathematical in its approach than Newtonian mechanics, as is the rest of modern physics.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K