Dimension of a Set: Definition & Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Set
Click For Summary
The dimension of a set typically refers to the dimension of the vector space spanned by that set, which is defined by the number of coordinates needed to specify each element. For example, R^3 has a dimension of 3, while a sphere has a dimension of 2. The dimension of the set of 2x2 matrices is 4, as it requires four real numbers to describe each matrix, and in general, the dimension of all nxn matrices is n^2. However, the concept of dimension is only applicable to structured sets, such as vector spaces, where operations like addition and scalar multiplication are defined. Therefore, dimension cannot be meaningfully discussed for arbitrary sets without additional structure.
Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
I'm familiar with the notion of the dimension of a vector space. Sometime earlier though, I ran into something asking for the dimension of a set of matrices. In general context, what is meant by the dimension of a set?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would think it's asking for the dimension of the space spanned by the set.
 
Its the number of coordinates you need to specify every element of the set. In R^3 each element is given uniquely by 3 real numbers so the dimension of R^3 is 3. The dimension of a sphere is two because you need only two angles to describe a point on the sphere. The dimsensio of the set of 2x2 matrices is 4 because you need 4 (ordered) real numbers to describe each matrice. In general the dimension of the set of all nxn matrices is n^2.

The definition of demension for a vector is the number of elements in any basis for that space.
 
Gear300 said:
I'm familiar with the notion of the dimension of a vector space. Sometime earlier though, I ran into something asking for the dimension of a set of matrices. In general context, what is meant by the dimension of a set?
NOTHING is meant by the dimension of a set! You must have a vector space to talk about dimension. And since you can add matrices and multiply matrices by numbers, the set of all m by n matrices is a vector space. But it makes no sense at all to talk about the "dimension" of an arbitrary set.
 
My understanding is that the term "space" and "set" are the same and may be used interchangeably.

The definition of a dimension of a set is applicable only to a linear set/space.

As the matrices form a linear operator set/space, the definition of dimension applies as in Deluks917.
 
Thanks for clarifying things...I was sort of confused when I started referring to the dimension of sets without structure.
 
the concept of dimension is discussed for lay persons in an essay by poincare in his collection, science and hypothesis, i believe. some structure is needed to define dimension. so in the case of matrices it would presumably be the structure imposed by viewing their entries as euclidean coordinates. there are more notions of dimension than just linear dimension though. e.g. a circle spans the plane linearly but has intrinsic dimension one according to poincare's criterion that a circle can be separated by removing a finite set of points. some topology at least is needed to discuss "separation".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K