How do I convert kg/m3 to g/cm3 and understand the logic behind it?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The conversion from kg/m³ to g/cm³ involves understanding the relationship between units of mass and volume. Specifically, 3200 kg/m³ converts to 3.2 g/cm³ by applying dimensional analysis, where 1 kg equals 1000 g and 1 m³ equals 1,000,000 cm³. The confusion arises from the fact that while a cubic meter is larger than a cubic centimeter, the conversion requires division by a million to account for the volume difference. This process ensures that the units are consistent and correctly reflect the density.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dimensional analysis
  • Knowledge of unit conversions (mass and volume)
  • Familiarity with metric system prefixes (kilo, centi)
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of dimensional analysis in depth
  • Learn about metric system conversions, focusing on mass and volume
  • Explore density calculations and their applications in real-world scenarios
  • Review examples of unit conversions in physics and chemistry
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, educators teaching unit conversions, and anyone needing clarity on dimensional analysis and metric conversions.

Nellen2222
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




How do I convert kg/m3 to g/cm3?.

3200kg/m^3 ---> 3.2g/cm^3


Homework Equations




The question was 3200kg/m3 = 3.2g/cm3. I don't understand the steps involved?

The Attempt at a Solution



I know how to do dimensional analysis, but I just don't really understand the logic in this. I'll go step by step and please explain this to me it is crucial!


1) 3200kg/m^3 ----> g/cm^3

2) 3200kg/m^3 * 1000kg/1g*1m^3/1*10^-6cm^3 = 3.2kg/cm^3

I just don't understand why I divide g/m^3 by a million to reach g/cm^3. Isnt one cm^3 a smaller value(or area) than a m^3? Shouldn't I be multiplying by a million?

For instance: if I don't have a density and simply convert 100m^3 to 100cm^3 the answer is 100 000 000 cm^3. This makes sense because a metre is larger than a CM thus the value will be bigger .

So, Why is this not the case for when I have a density? Why do I have to divide by a million in order to go from m^3 to cm^3 in that case and ultimately reach a smaller value.

Please help me understand where my logic goes wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
3200 kg m-3 = 3200 kg m-3 X 1000 g kg-1/ 100000 cm3 m-3
 
? what
 
Convert kg into g. (multiplying 1000 g per kg)

Convert cubic metre into cubic centimetre (dividing 1000000 cc per cubic metre)

Dimensions are matched, so we get the right answer.
 
The dimensions can match but the coefficiant(value in front) can be in either spot.. so technically can still have the wrong answer..
 
Man, they are correct. If you are adamant to make mistake, even God can't help it then. Using dimensions in coefficients helps us to determine if we are going on the right path.

Ask yourself - How many grams in a kilogram? How many cc in a litre -> how many litres in a cubic metre?
 
yeah- its all about 'ask yourself' - I just don't get why I am dividing by a million if a m^3 is bigger than a metre^3..
 
? What are you saying!? Isn't metre is shorted as m?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
975
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K