- #1

- 1

- 0

1/2 is not considered as it does not have any dimension. But then does it not affect the formula. Why? Explain!! Please

- Thread starter Zerocool97
- Start date

- #1

- 1

- 0

1/2 is not considered as it does not have any dimension. But then does it not affect the formula. Why? Explain!! Please

- #2

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 17,857

- 1,654

Welcome to PF;

Of course the value of 1/2 affects the formula... what is there to explain?

Of course the value of 1/2 affects the formula... what is there to explain?

- #3

- 1,948

- 200

- #4

- 2,123

- 79

Dimensional analysis is generally done with a few chosen "basic" dimensions. For most problems in Newtonian mechanics, length, mass and time (LMT) are sufficient. For energy, dimensions are: [itex] E=ML^{2}T^{-2}[/itex]. The dimensional formula does not distinguish between kinetic and potential energy. Dimensionless values such as 1/2 in the KE formula do not appear in the dimensional formula.

1/2 is not considered as it does not have any dimension. But then does it not affect the formula. Why? Explain!! Please

Also, dimensional formulas do not distinguish between energy density and pressure. Both are represented by the formula [itex]ML^{-1}T^{-2}[/itex]. The difference is that energy density is a scalar quantity and pressure is a vector quantity.

DA is useful in showing relationships between different formulas used in physics. That doesn't mean that different formulas with the same dimensional formula are necessarily strictly equivalent. They may only be dimensionally equivalent.

Last edited:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 16K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 945

- Last Post

- Replies
- 12

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 16

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 532

- Last Post

- Replies
- 26

- Views
- 5K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 927