Dimentional reduction: branworld or Yau-calibi manifolds?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds Reduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on dimensional reduction in string theory, specifically comparing the large dimensions approach and the compactified Yau-Calabi manifold approach. Participants explore the feasibility of having one or two large dimensions alongside a four-folded Yau-Calabi space. The conversation emphasizes the need to determine which dimensional scenario aligns more closely with the physical characteristics of our universe. Additionally, the potential mathematical equivalence between the "4 normal dimensions + 6D Calabi-Yau manifold" and the "10D large dimensions on branes" is questioned.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of string theory principles
  • Familiarity with dimensional reduction concepts
  • Knowledge of Calabi-Yau manifolds
  • Basic grasp of brane theory in high-dimensional physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of large extra dimensions in string theory
  • Study the properties and applications of Calabi-Yau manifolds
  • Examine the duality between different dimensional reduction approaches
  • Explore the role of branes in higher-dimensional theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, string theorists, and researchers interested in the implications of dimensional reduction in high-energy physics.

dimentional reduction: braneworld or Yau-calibi manifolds?

  • Im a string theorist who prefer large braneworld

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I am a string theorist who prefers Yau-Calibi compactification

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
string theorists, there are two approaches to reducing 11 dimensions to 4, they are large and we are stuck on one, or they are compactified, too small to see. Which approach makes the most contact with physics?

Is it possible to have 1-2 large dimensions and a 4-folded Yau-Calbi space?

String theory has it to determine which scenario produces physics of our world -- large extra dimensions or small ones?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would like to tack on another question to ensabah's:

Is there any context in which the "4 normal dimensions + 6D calabi yau manifold" approach and the "10d large dimensions but everything's stuck on branes" approach are dual or mathematically equivalent?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K