EmilyRuck
- 134
- 6
Hello!
By manipulating Maxwell's equation, with the potential vector \mathbf{A} and the Lorentz' gauge, one can obtain the following vector wave equation:
∇^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) + k^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) = -\mu \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r})
The first step for the solution is to consider a point source - \delta (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'). But what about its meaning in a vector form?
A vector is a 1-dimensional object in the space; a point is a 0-dimensional object, according to linear algebra. How can we relate a 0-dimensional object to a vector context?
With such a source, the unknown function is a Green function and the previous equation becomes
∇^2 G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}') + k^2 G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}') = - \delta (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}')
but now we don't have a vector function \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) any more, but just a scalar function G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}'). Why?
This is like saying that, when the source is a point, the vector potential \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) becomes scalar...?!
Thank you for having read,
Emily
By manipulating Maxwell's equation, with the potential vector \mathbf{A} and the Lorentz' gauge, one can obtain the following vector wave equation:
∇^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) + k^2 \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) = -\mu \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{r})
The first step for the solution is to consider a point source - \delta (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}'). But what about its meaning in a vector form?
A vector is a 1-dimensional object in the space; a point is a 0-dimensional object, according to linear algebra. How can we relate a 0-dimensional object to a vector context?
With such a source, the unknown function is a Green function and the previous equation becomes
∇^2 G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}') + k^2 G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}') = - \delta (\mathbf{r} - \mathbf{r}')
but now we don't have a vector function \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) any more, but just a scalar function G(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{r}'). Why?
This is like saying that, when the source is a point, the vector potential \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{r}) becomes scalar...?!
Thank you for having read,
Emily