Dirac Equation in (-,++++) Notation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Dirac equation in (-,++++) notation is expressed as (iγ^{\mu}∂_{\mu} - m)ψ = 0, which does not equate to (-iγ^{0}∂_{0} + iγ^{i}∂_{i} - m)ψ = 0. The correct interpretation involves summing over repeated indices, leading to γ^{\mu}∂_{\mu} = γ^{0}∂_{0} + γ^{1}∂_{1} + γ^{2}∂_{2} + γ^{3}∂_{3}. The Minkowski metric is only necessary when both indices are either up or down, resulting in η^{\mu\nu}γ_{\mu}∂_{\nu} = -γ^{0}∂_{0} + γ^{1}∂_{1} + γ^{2}∂_{2} + γ^{3}∂_{3}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Dirac equation
  • Familiarity with Minkowski spacetime and metrics
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and index manipulation
  • Basic quantum mechanics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Dirac equation in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the properties of the Minkowski metric in different notations
  • Explore advanced topics in quantum mechanics related to spinors
  • Investigate the role of index notation in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on particle physics and relativistic quantum field theories.

pleasehelpmeno
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Just to clarify in the dirac equation [itex](i\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} -m)\psi=0[/itex]

Is it equal to [itex](-i\gamma^{0}\partial_{0}+i\gamma^{i}\partial_{i} -m)\psi=0[/itex] in (-,++++) notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, for a repeated index with one index up and one index down, just sum:

γμμ = γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33

You only need to use the Minkowski metric if both indices are up, or both indices down:

ημνγμν = - γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33

or ημνγμν = - γ00 + γ11 + γ22 + γ33
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K