In Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics, he develops the Dirac notation of bras and kets. In one part, he states (page 17):(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

<B|X|A>

= (<A|X^|B>)*

= <A|X^|B>*

where X^ denotes the Hermitian adjoint (the conjugate transpose) of the operator X.

My question is, since a bra is the conjugate transpose of a ket, could we write

<B|X|A>^ = <A|X|B>

(since of course X^ = X (ie. X is Hermitian) for real, measurable quantities).

What I'm trying to ask is, does Sakurai define a separate conjugate transpose of the bras and kets, whereby he just takes the complex conjugate and implicitly also transposes it (ie.

|A>* = <A| ). Normally, I would expect to see |A>^ = <A|.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Dirac notation and conjugate transpose in Sakurai

Loading...

Similar Threads - Dirac notation conjugate | Date |
---|---|

I Confused about Dirac Notation | Jan 13, 2018 |

I Double sided arrow notation in Dirac Field Lagrangian | Oct 30, 2017 |

I Confusion about Dirac Notation (interferometer) | Oct 15, 2017 |

I Bracket VS wavefunction notation in QM | Jun 21, 2017 |

I Completeness relation | Apr 21, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**