A Dirac's "comprehensive action principle" -- independent equations

Kostik
Messages
269
Reaction score
32
TL;DR Summary
Dirac employs a general action principle to obtain Einstein's equation and the other dynamical equations for the various "coordinates" in the combined action. But these equations are not all independent, because.....
In Dirac's "General Theory of Relativity", he develops the "comprehensive action principle" in chapter 30. Simply put, he writes a combined action for the gravitational field and all other matter-energy fields ##I=I_g+I'##. Varying this: $$\delta(I_g+I')=\int ( p^{\mu\nu}\delta g_{\mu\nu} + \sum_n \chi^n \delta \phi_n ) \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x$$ The function ##p^{\mu\nu}## picks up a term ##-(16\pi)^{-1} \left( R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R \right)## from the gravitational field, plus any other terms in ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## coming from the other matter-energy fields, which Dirac denotes by ##N^{\mu\nu}##.

Setting ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## and ##\chi^n = 0## gives the equations for the "coordinates" ##g_{\mu\nu}## and ##\phi_n##. Thus, for example, if ##I'## includes the action for the electromagnetic field and a distribution of charged matter, we get Einstein's equation plus Maxwell's (inhomogeneous) equations and the Lorentz force equation.

In chapter 30, Dirac writes $$p^{\mu\nu}= -(16\pi)^{-1} \left( R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R \right) + N^{\mu\nu}$$ and shows that ##{N^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu}=0##. He concludes that "the equations ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## and ##\chi^n = 0## "are not all independent."

How does he conclude that?


Of course, because of the contracted Bianci relation, we have ##{p^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu} = {N^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu}=0##. But this doesn't seem particularly interesting, since we are setting ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## as one of the equations, and ##p^{\mu\nu}## (or ##N^{\mu\nu}##) does not involve the ##\chi^n##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
N consists of various fields, e.g., matter, EM field. Each fileld could be independent but there is a constraint that covariant divergent of their sum, N, should be zero.
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top