A Dirac's "comprehensive action principle" -- independent equations

Click For Summary
Dirac's "comprehensive action principle" combines the actions of the gravitational field and other matter-energy fields into a single expression. By varying this combined action, he derives equations for the gravitational field and other fields, leading to a relationship that includes Einstein's equations and Maxwell's equations. He establishes that the equations for the components of the gravitational field and matter fields are not all independent due to the contracted Bianchi identity, which implies a constraint on the covariant divergence of the sum of the fields. This results in a necessary condition that must be satisfied for the combined action principle to hold. The discussion highlights the interdependence of the equations derived from Dirac's formulation.
Kostik
Messages
274
Reaction score
32
TL;DR
Dirac employs a general action principle to obtain Einstein's equation and the other dynamical equations for the various "coordinates" in the combined action. But these equations are not all independent, because.....
In Dirac's "General Theory of Relativity", he develops the "comprehensive action principle" in chapter 30. Simply put, he writes a combined action for the gravitational field and all other matter-energy fields ##I=I_g+I'##. Varying this: $$\delta(I_g+I')=\int ( p^{\mu\nu}\delta g_{\mu\nu} + \sum_n \chi^n \delta \phi_n ) \sqrt{-g} \, d^4 x$$ The function ##p^{\mu\nu}## picks up a term ##-(16\pi)^{-1} \left( R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R \right)## from the gravitational field, plus any other terms in ##\delta g_{\mu\nu}## coming from the other matter-energy fields, which Dirac denotes by ##N^{\mu\nu}##.

Setting ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## and ##\chi^n = 0## gives the equations for the "coordinates" ##g_{\mu\nu}## and ##\phi_n##. Thus, for example, if ##I'## includes the action for the electromagnetic field and a distribution of charged matter, we get Einstein's equation plus Maxwell's (inhomogeneous) equations and the Lorentz force equation.

In chapter 30, Dirac writes $$p^{\mu\nu}= -(16\pi)^{-1} \left( R^{\mu\nu}-\frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}R \right) + N^{\mu\nu}$$ and shows that ##{N^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu}=0##. He concludes that "the equations ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## and ##\chi^n = 0## "are not all independent."

How does he conclude that?


Of course, because of the contracted Bianci relation, we have ##{p^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu} = {N^{\mu\nu}}_{;\nu}=0##. But this doesn't seem particularly interesting, since we are setting ##p^{\mu\nu}=0## as one of the equations, and ##p^{\mu\nu}## (or ##N^{\mu\nu}##) does not involve the ##\chi^n##.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
N consists of various fields, e.g., matter, EM field. Each fileld could be independent but there is a constraint that covariant divergent of their sum, N, should be zero.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
871
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
943