A Dirac's coordinates ##(\tau, \rho)## for the Schwarzschild metric with ##r \le 2m##

Click For Summary
Dirac's coordinates ##(\tau, \rho)## for the Schwarzschild metric eliminate the coordinate singularity at ##r=2m##, with specific transformations provided. The coordinate ##\tau## resembles Gullstrand–Painlevé coordinates but includes an additional ##r^{3/2}## term. The discussion touches on the potential naming of these coordinates, suggesting they may be related to Lemaitre coordinates. A correction was made regarding a typo in the original expressions. The coordinates are further analyzed in Landau & Lifshitz Vol 2, providing additional insights.
Kostik
Messages
274
Reaction score
32
TL;DR
Do Dirac's coordinates ##(\tau, \rho)## for the Schwarzschild metric have any recognized name?
Dirac in his "GTR" (Chap 19, page 34-35) finds a coordinate system ##(\tau, \rho)## which has no coordinate singularity at ##r=2m##. Explicitly, the transformation looks like (after some algebra):
$$\tau=t + 4m\sqrt{\frac{r}{2m}} + 2m\log{\frac{\sqrt{r/2m}-1}{\sqrt{r/2m}+1}}$$
$$\rho=t + \frac{2r}{3}\sqrt{\frac{r}{2m}} + 4m\sqrt{\frac{r}{2m}} + 2m\log{\frac{\sqrt{r/2m}-1}{\sqrt{r/2m}+1}}$$
The first coordinate ##\tau## is similar to Gullstrand–Painlevé coordinates, except for the first term with an ##r^{3/2}## factor.

Is there a specific name for these coordinates attributable to their original discoverer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with it, but I can have a look round later. Your last term in both expressions reduces to zero, though - presumably a typo and probably worth correcting.
 
Ibix said:
I'm not familiar with it, but I can have a look round later. Your last term in both expressions reduces to zero, though - presumably a typo and probably worth correcting.
Thanks - yes, fixed it.
 
Thanks! That looks exactly right.
 
I found a superb analysis of these coordinates in Landau & Lifshitz Vol 2.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
495
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
889
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K