Boundary conditions on the Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the boundary conditions of the Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole, particularly focusing on the identification of angular coordinates and the implications of regularity at the origin. The scope includes theoretical considerations related to black hole geometry and coordinate transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references Thomas Hartman's notes and questions why the regularity at the origin implies a specific identification of the angular coordinate.
  • Another participant argues that it is the "angular" coordinate derived from the Wick rotation that is identified, not the angular coordinate φ, and clarifies that the origin is at r = 2M.
  • A further inquiry is made about how to explicitly demonstrate that the range r < 2M is not covered by the τ coordinate in the Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole.
  • Another participant challenges the clarity of the previous question, suggesting that the coverage of the range r < 2M should be assessed based on the behavior of the r coordinate itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on which coordinate is identified and the implications of regularity at the origin. The discussion remains unresolved with competing interpretations of the coordinates involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of consensus on the identification of coordinates and the implications for the coverage of the Schwarzschild solution, particularly regarding the behavior of the r coordinate in different regions.

Afonso Campos
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
This question is based on page 71 of Thomas Hartman's notes on Quantum Gravity and Black Holes (http://www.hartmanhep.net/topics2015/gravity-lectures.pdf).

The Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole

$$ds^{2} = \left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)d\tau^{2} + \frac{dr^{2}}{1-\frac{2M}{r}} + r^{2}d\Omega_{2}^{2}$$

is obtained from the Lorentzian Schwarzschild black hole via Wick rotation ##t \to -i\tau##.

Why does the fact that the coordinates must be regular at the origin imply that the angular coordinate must be identified as

$$\phi \sim \phi + 8\pi M?$$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Afonso Campos said:
Why does the fact that the coordinates must be regular at the origin imply that the angular coordinate must be identified

It isn't the angular coordinate ##\phi## that's identified, it's the "angular" coordinate ##\tau##--the one that is derived via ##t \rightarrow - i \tau##. The "origin" is ##r = 2M##, and the solution has no interior, so the only range covered is ##r \ge 2M##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Afonso Campos
PeterDonis said:
It isn't the angular coordinate ##\phi## that's identified, it's the "angular" coordinate ##\tau##--the one that is derived via ##t \rightarrow - i \tau##. The "origin" is ##r = 2M##, and the solution has no interior, so the only range covered is ##r \ge 2M##.

How can we see explicitly that the range ##r < 2M## in the Lorentzian Schwarzschild black hole is not covered by the ##\tau## coordinate in the Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole?
 
Afonso Campos said:
How can we see explicitly that the range ##r < 2M## in the Lorentzian Schwarzschild black hole is not covered by the ττ\tau coordinate in the Euclidean Schwarzschild black hole?

The question doesn't make sense. To see whether the range ##r < 2M## is covered or not, you look at the behavior of the ##r## coordinate, not any other coordinate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Afonso Campos

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K