B Direct sum decomposition into orthogonal subspaces

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter sindhuja
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
In quantum information processing, the N = 2^n dimensional vector space for an n-qubit system can be decomposed into orthogonal subspaces, represented as V = S1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Sk, where k indicates the number of possible measurement outcomes. Each measurement corresponds to a self-adjoint operator on this Hilbert space, with the outcomes being the eigenvalues of the operator. The eigenvectors associated with each eigenvalue form orthogonal eigenspaces, ensuring that measurements yield distinct results for different eigenvalues. This decomposition highlights that if eigenvalues are degenerate, the measuring device cannot fully resolve the state information within that subspace. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the fundamentals of quantum measurement and state representation.
sindhuja
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Hello All, I am trying to understand quantum information processing. I am reading the book "Quantum Computing A Gentle Introduction" by Eleanor Rieffel and Wolfgang Polak. I want to understand the following better:

" Let V be the N = 2^n dimensional vector space associated with an n-qubit system. Any device that measures this system has an associated direct sum decomposition into orthogonal subspaces V = S1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Sk for some k ≤ N. The number k corresponds to the maximum number of possible measurement outcomesfor a state measured with that particular device."

Could anyone explain the intuition behind this statement. I think it is a quiet simple beginner level concept which I have not been getting a satisfactory explanation for. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know this book, but I guess what's meant is the following: If you measure some observable (in this case on a system ##n## qubits), this observable is described by some self-adjoint operator on the ##2^n##-dimensional Hilbert space, describing the ##n##-qubit system. You can think of it as a matrix ##\hat{A}## operating on ##\mathbb{C}^{2^n}##-column vectors, which are the components of a vector wrt. an aribtrary orthonormal basis (e.g., the product basis of the ##n## qubits). The possible outcomes of measurements are the eigenvalues of this operator/matrix. To each eigenvalue ##a## there is at least one eigenvector. There's always a basis of eigenvectors, and you can always choose this basis to be an orthonormal set. The eigenvectors for each eigenvalue ##a## span a subspace ##S_i=\mathrm{Eig}(a_i)##. The vectors in eigenspaces of different eigenvalues are always orthogonal to each other (again, because the matrix is self-adjoint). Thus the entire vector space is decomposed into the orthogonal sum of these eigenspaces, ##V=S_1 \oplus S_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus S_k##, where the ##a_i## with ##i \in \{1,\ldots,k \}## are the different eigenvectors. Of course the dimensions of these subspaces are such that
$$\sum_{i=1}^k \mathrm{dim} \text{Eig}(a_i)=\mathrm{dim} V=2^n.$$
 
You can also think of it as saying that when there are degenerate eigenvalues, a measuring device capable of measuring only the associated observable cannot give complete state information. The measuring device is incapable of resolving the decomposition of the state within the degenerate subspace, ##S_i##.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...