B Direct sum decomposition into orthogonal subspaces

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter sindhuja
  • Start date Start date
sindhuja
Messages
3
Reaction score
2
Hello All, I am trying to understand quantum information processing. I am reading the book "Quantum Computing A Gentle Introduction" by Eleanor Rieffel and Wolfgang Polak. I want to understand the following better:

" Let V be the N = 2^n dimensional vector space associated with an n-qubit system. Any device that measures this system has an associated direct sum decomposition into orthogonal subspaces V = S1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ Sk for some k ≤ N. The number k corresponds to the maximum number of possible measurement outcomesfor a state measured with that particular device."

Could anyone explain the intuition behind this statement. I think it is a quiet simple beginner level concept which I have not been getting a satisfactory explanation for. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know this book, but I guess what's meant is the following: If you measure some observable (in this case on a system ##n## qubits), this observable is described by some self-adjoint operator on the ##2^n##-dimensional Hilbert space, describing the ##n##-qubit system. You can think of it as a matrix ##\hat{A}## operating on ##\mathbb{C}^{2^n}##-column vectors, which are the components of a vector wrt. an aribtrary orthonormal basis (e.g., the product basis of the ##n## qubits). The possible outcomes of measurements are the eigenvalues of this operator/matrix. To each eigenvalue ##a## there is at least one eigenvector. There's always a basis of eigenvectors, and you can always choose this basis to be an orthonormal set. The eigenvectors for each eigenvalue ##a## span a subspace ##S_i=\mathrm{Eig}(a_i)##. The vectors in eigenspaces of different eigenvalues are always orthogonal to each other (again, because the matrix is self-adjoint). Thus the entire vector space is decomposed into the orthogonal sum of these eigenspaces, ##V=S_1 \oplus S_2 \oplus \cdots \oplus S_k##, where the ##a_i## with ##i \in \{1,\ldots,k \}## are the different eigenvectors. Of course the dimensions of these subspaces are such that
$$\sum_{i=1}^k \mathrm{dim} \text{Eig}(a_i)=\mathrm{dim} V=2^n.$$
 
You can also think of it as saying that when there are degenerate eigenvalues, a measuring device capable of measuring only the associated observable cannot give complete state information. The measuring device is incapable of resolving the decomposition of the state within the degenerate subspace, ##S_i##.
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top