MHB Direct sum of p-primary components of an R-module counterexample?

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Let $x \in R - \{0\},$ where $R$ is a domain.

Define $T_x(M) = \{m \in M \ | \ x^n m=0 \ \ \mathrm{for \ some} \ n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ as the $x$-torsion of $M.$

I know that $T_x(M \oplus N) = T_x(M) \oplus T_x(N)$ for $R$-modules $M,N$ only if $R$ is a PID.

But I can't think of a counterexample for $R$ an integral domain.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kalish said:
Let $x \in R - \{0\},$ where $R$ is a domain.

Define $T_x(M) = \{m \in M \ | \ x^n m=0 \ \ \mathrm{for \ some} \ n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ as the $x$-torsion of $M.$

I know that $T_x(M \oplus N) = T_x(M) \oplus T_x(N)$ for $R$-modules $M,N$ only if $R$ is a PID.

But I can't think of a counterexample for $R$ an integral domain.

Any ideas?

Here is the modified problem:

Let $x \in R - \{0\},$ where $R$ is a domain.

Define $T_x(M) = \{m \in M \ | \ x^n m=0 \ \ \mathrm{for \ some} \ n \in \mathbb{N}\}$ as the $x$-torsion of $M.$

I need to show that $T_x(M \oplus N) = T_x(M) \oplus T_x(N)$ for $R$-modules $M,N$ or show that there is a counterexample.

Why is this proof wrong?

Take $(a,b)\in T_x(M\oplus N)$. Then there exist $m,n \in \mathbb{N},$ not necessarily equal, such that $x^m a + x^n b=0.$ Take $(a,b)\in T_x(M) \oplus T_x(N)$. Then there exist $m,n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $x^m a=0$ and $x^n b=0.$ So if $(a,b)\in T_x(M) \oplus T_x(N),$ then $(a,b)\in T_x(M\oplus N).$ But the converse is not true. Thus $T(M \oplus N) \neq T(M) \oplus T(N).$
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top