Discontinuity of Spacetime (and other things)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of spacetime, specifically whether it is continuous or quantized. Participants explore implications of both possibilities and relate these ideas to current theories in physics, including quantum gravity and string theory. The conversation touches on theoretical, conceptual, and speculative aspects of spacetime in the context of general relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for the idea of continuous spacetime, suggesting it aligns better with their understanding of discrete matter and energy interactions.
  • Others propose that the theory of quantum gravity aims to quantize spacetime, implying it may consist of discrete chunks rather than being continuous.
  • A question is raised about the implications of quantized spacetime on the locational probability distribution of particles in quantum mechanics, suggesting it could challenge the concept of a "spacetime continuum."
  • Participants note the incompatibility between GR, which requires continuous spacetime, and QM, which may imply discreteness, leading to unresolved tensions in modern physics.
  • Concerns are voiced regarding string theory, including its multitude of possible configurations and its lack of testable predictions, which some argue undermines its scientific validity.
  • One participant reflects on the current understanding of quantum theory, noting that while some aspects are discrete, others, like the location of free electrons, may still form a continuum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the continuity of spacetime, with no consensus reached. Some favor the idea of continuity, while others support the notion of quantization. The discussion reflects ongoing debates and uncertainties in the field.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of current theories and the unresolved nature of the relationship between GR and QM, as well as the implications of string theory's challenges.

Jonnyb42
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
We know that matter is discrete, and energy is quantized, (and more quantized things I don't know about.) There is also Planck length? and Planck time?

Is spacetime continuous?
If we don't know yet, I sure hope it is, because I much prefer to imagine discrete matter and energy interacting in a continuous "environment."

What implications would there be if spacetime was not continuous?

I, for some reason, really hope that spacetime is continuous.

Then again, I also think that whatever is the real case, perhaps it would be possible to model spacetime to be continuous and not care about what it really is, as long as it explains phenomenon and can be used to engineer things.

Oh, one more thing: What is the deal with string theory? Why has it been a candidate for a theory of everything for so long? What are string theorists working on at the moment? What does string theory have to say about spacetime, (other than it's dimensions, for example, it's continuity.)?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Jonnyb42 said:
Is spacetime continuous?
If we don't know yet, I sure hope it is, because I much prefer to imagine discrete matter and energy interacting in a continuous "environment."

I'm not a scientist, but I think the theory for determining whether spacetime is continuous or not is called 'quantum gravity'. Its goal is to quantize space, from what I understand. That would mean spacetime consists of discrete chunks and is not continuous.

I personally don't believe that there is a totally continuous environment at any order of magnitude below what we can currently probe.
 
Hmm, well if spacetime is quantized, does that mean that a locational probability distribution (in quantum mechanics) for a particle in a closed region would only contain a finite number of possible "locations" rather than a continuous cloud of probability?

Wouldn't that also make the "spacetime continuum" a misnomer?
 
Last edited:
Jonnyb42 said:
What implications would there be if spacetime was not continuous?

I, for some reason, really hope that spacetime is continuous.

Then again, I also think that whatever is the real case, perhaps it would be possible to model spacetime to be continuous and not care about what it really is, as long as it explains phenomenon and can be used to engineer things.
This is one of the biggest mysteries of our time: the incompatibility between our two major theories: GR and QM. For GR, spacetime must be continuous; for QM, it must be discrete. When you try to reconcile them, you get non-sensical answers.
 
This is one of the biggest mysteries of our time: the incompatibility between our two major theories: GR and QM.
By any chance, do you (or anyone else) know how string theory is coming along? I know it is a candidate for a theory of everything, but what are it's current obstacles?
 
Jonnyb42 said:
By any chance, do you (or anyone else) know how string theory is coming along? I know it is a candidate for a theory of everything, but what are it's current obstacles?

Last I heard (and it's been a while),
1] string theory allows so many possibilities (virtually countless) for the configuration of the universe that it doesn't explain why this is the one we got.
2] It doesn't predict anything testable, which is another way of saying it is not falsifiable, which is another way of saying it's not scientifically valid.

...and a quick peek at the Wiki entry for it suggests these are still problems.
 
I've only ever paddled in shallow waters of quantum theory, but the impression I have is that although some things are discrete, like the energy levels of an atom, or the decomposition of matter and electromagnetic radiation into discrete particles, there are lots of other things that aren't discrete. For example, the location of a free electron in empty space may be uncertain, but the possible locations form a continuum. (People who say that all distances are an integer multiple of a Planck length have, I believe, misunderstood the concept -- that would be incompatible with relativity anyway.)

That's my impression of our current understanding, but as we don't yet have a successful merger of GR and quantum theory, who knows what that might turn up?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
28K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K