Discovering the First Binary Star System: The Fascinating Binary System Story

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the identification of the first binary star system ever discovered, with a focus on historical records and interpretations of ancient observations. Participants explore the distinction between visual binaries and gravitationally bound binary stars, as well as the implications of ancient astronomical knowledge.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that Xi Ursae Majoris was the first binary star system discovered by Sir William Herschel in 1780.
  • Others argue that ancient records suggest that stars like Mizar and Alcor were recognized as binary by early astronomers, although the understanding of them as gravitationally bound systems was not established until later.
  • There is a contention regarding the validity of ancient observations, with some participants questioning whether the proper motion of Mizar and Alcor could have been perceived given their vast distance and the limitations of observational technology at the time.
  • Some participants seek references to support claims about ancient observations, emphasizing the need for credible sources rather than anecdotal evidence.
  • A participant mentions that the orbital period of Mizar and Alcor is approximately 10 million years, suggesting that ancient astronomers would not have been able to observe their motion over such a long timescale.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of visual binaries versus gravitationally bound binaries, with some participants clarifying that ancient observations may not equate to the modern understanding of binary star systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether Xi Ursae Majoris is definitively the first binary star system discovered, as there are competing views regarding ancient observations of other star pairs. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of historical records and the nature of binary stars.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the reliability of ancient astronomical observations and the definitions of binary systems, highlighting the complexity of historical interpretations and the evolution of astronomical knowledge.

Phy_enthusiast
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
which is the first binary star system discovered ever?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
ok.but is it the first ever known to man?
 
Per wiki:

Xi Ursae Majoris (Xi UMa, ξ Ursae Majoris, ξ UMa) is a star system in the constellation Ursa Major. On May 2, 1780, Sir William Herschel discovered that this was a binary star system, making it the first such system ever discovered.

I'd say that's a yes.
 
but there are ancient records that people identified some stars to be binary...even before gravity was discovered.
 
Phy_enthusiast said:
but there are ancient records that people identified some stars to be binary...even before gravity was discovered.

Those are visual binaries. Some of them have turned out to be real binary stars, but no one actually knew about gravitationally bound binary stars until 1780.
 
Last edited:
Phy_enthusiast said:
but there are ancient records that people identified some stars to be binary...even before gravity was discovered.

Please provide references for this. Especially if you are going to claim the answer you got was wrong.
 
Consider the other easy binaries...
from
http://www.ianridpath.com/binaries.htm
Xi UMa/Alula Australis - semimajor separation 2,5´´, period 60 years, magnitudes 4,3/4,8
for comparison:
Eta Cas - 12´´, 480y, 3,5/7,4
Alpha For - 4,0´´, 269y, 4,0/7,2
Castor - 6,8´´, 467y, 1,9/3,0
Gamma Leo - 4,2´´, 510y, 2,4/3,6
Gamma Vir - 3,6´´, 169y, 3,5/3,5
Toliman - 7,6´´, 80y, 0,0/1,3
Xi Boo - 4,9´´, 152y, 4,8/7,0
44 Boo - 3,7´´, 210y, 4,8/6
70 Oph - 4,5´´, 88y, 4,2/6,2
61 Cygni - 24,3´´, 678y, 5,4/6,1
Zeta Aquarii - 3,4´´, 487y, 4,3/4,5

It is odd that Alula Australis should have been the first... compared to say 70 Ophiuchi and especially Toliman.
 
from ancient times it is known in indian astronomy that two stars mizar and alcor is a binary system in big dipper asterism.
 
  • #10
it is probably the most ancient and first of its kind discovered in sky by early astronomers
 
  • #11
Phy_enthusiast said:
from ancient times it is known in indian astronomy that two stars mizar and alcor is a binary system in big dipper asterism.

Phy_enthusiast said:
it is probably the most ancient and first of its kind discovered in sky by early astronomers

Yes, but they didn't know it was an actual binary star at the time. And by "actual" I mean two stars gravitationally bound to each other.
 
  • #12
It is mentioned in indian texts that one of the star moves ahead of other over certain period of time and then the first one moves ahead of second one.this obserbvation of movement clearly indicates first sign of astronomical phenomenon of binary star.
 
  • #13
This observation was made over a course of many centuries in indian astronomy.
 
  • #14
Mind giving a reference?
 
  • #15
You can search for Vashistha and arundhati on internet.These are the ancient indian name for Mizar and alcor.
 
  • #16
Throwing them into an orbital period calculator gives me an orbital period of approximately 10 million years. Assuming I'm within even an order of magnitude, it seems unlikely that ancient indians could know they moved with each other. The time scale is simply too long. Even over 5,000 years their orbital motion would not be able to be seen.
 
  • #17
A reference is not a "google search" for two star names. Please. We want real references here. Do you know what that means? An article written by an expert astronomer, could be a hundred years old. Observations you mention were made visually a long time ago and cannot be verified as an observation of a real gravity-bound system.

This seems like a rhetorical post to me. You assume you already know the answer, and it appears that you do not.

Thanks.
 
  • #18
I don't know the answer, i suggested alcor and mizar because it was observed before william herschel discovered other binaries.I think they were first visual binaries ever discovered.But there proper motion was also studied by ancient indians.
 
  • #19
Phy_enthusiast said:
I don't know the answer, i suggested alcor and mizar because it was observed before william herschel discovered other binaries.I think they were first visual binaries ever discovered.

Alcor and Mizar have been known as a visual double since before antiquity.

But there proper motion was also studied by ancient indians.

I don't see how. They are WAAAY too far apart for their orbital motion around each other to be noticeable over a few thousand years. Especially before the invention of the telescope in the 1600's. It's likely that any reference to them moving around each other is based on something other than visual observation.
 
  • #20
Drakkith said:
It's likely that any reference to them moving around each other is based on something other than visual observation.

Information from Ancient Aliens?
 
  • #21
This thread does not meet our standards for sourcing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K