MHB Discovering the Inverse Fourier Transform

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Email
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding the Inverse Fourier Transform of the function F(ω) = -5(iω + 4) / (16 + (iω + 4)²). It is noted that Miko initially attempted to apply a shift incorrectly. The correct approach involves recognizing that the function can be expressed in terms of known Fourier Transform pairs from a reference table. After algebraic manipulation, the Inverse Fourier Transform is determined to be -5e^(-4t)e^(4it)H(t) + 5ie^(-4t)sin(4t)H(t). This solution is shared for Miko and others with similar inquiries.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Miko asks:

What is the Inverse Fourier Transform of [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) = \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16+(i\omega + 4)^2} \end{align*}[/math]?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Miko asks:

What is the Inverse Fourier Transform of [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) = \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16+(i\omega + 4)^2} \end{align*}[/math]?

Miko has sent me a scan with a great attempt of this question, but has tried to use a shift when a shift is not necessary.

From a table of Fourier Transforms, we can see that [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{a + i(\omega + k)}{k^2 + (a + i\omega)} \right\} = e^{-at}e^{ikt}H(t) \end{align*}[/math] and [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{k}{k^2 + (a + i\omega)^2} \right\} = e^{-at}\sin{(kt)} H(t) \end{align*}[/math]. The function given has an identical denominator (with [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} a = 4 \end{align*}[/math] and [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} k = 4 \end{align*}[/math]) and so it would suggest that the function given is a combination of the functions given in the tables. So doing some algebraic manipulation...

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) &= \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= \frac{-5i\omega - 20}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= \frac{-5i(\omega + 4) + 20i - 20}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= -5 \left[ \frac{4 + i(\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] + 5i \left[ \frac{4}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] \end{align*}[/math]

which is now in the forms given in the tables. Therefore

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right\} &= \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ -5 \left[ \frac{4 + i(\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] + 5i \left[ \frac{4}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] \right\} \\ &= -5e^{-4t}e^{4it}H(t) + 5i\,e^{-4t}\sin{(4t)}H(t) \end{align*}[/math]For Miko and anyone else viewing this and having similar questions, I invite you to read and post in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f16/ subforum.
 
Thread 'erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K