MHB Discovering the Inverse Fourier Transform

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Email
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
Miko asks:

What is the Inverse Fourier Transform of [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) = \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16+(i\omega + 4)^2} \end{align*}[/math]?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Miko asks:

What is the Inverse Fourier Transform of [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) = \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16+(i\omega + 4)^2} \end{align*}[/math]?

Miko has sent me a scan with a great attempt of this question, but has tried to use a shift when a shift is not necessary.

From a table of Fourier Transforms, we can see that [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{a + i(\omega + k)}{k^2 + (a + i\omega)} \right\} = e^{-at}e^{ikt}H(t) \end{align*}[/math] and [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{k}{k^2 + (a + i\omega)^2} \right\} = e^{-at}\sin{(kt)} H(t) \end{align*}[/math]. The function given has an identical denominator (with [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} a = 4 \end{align*}[/math] and [math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} k = 4 \end{align*}[/math]) and so it would suggest that the function given is a combination of the functions given in the tables. So doing some algebraic manipulation...

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} F(\omega) &= \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= \frac{-5i\omega - 20}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= \frac{-5i(\omega + 4) + 20i - 20}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \\ &= -5 \left[ \frac{4 + i(\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] + 5i \left[ \frac{4}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] \end{align*}[/math]

which is now in the forms given in the tables. Therefore

[math]\displaystyle \begin{align*} \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ \frac{-5(i\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right\} &= \mathcal{F}^{-1} \left\{ -5 \left[ \frac{4 + i(\omega + 4)}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] + 5i \left[ \frac{4}{16 + (i\omega + 4)^2} \right] \right\} \\ &= -5e^{-4t}e^{4it}H(t) + 5i\,e^{-4t}\sin{(4t)}H(t) \end{align*}[/math]For Miko and anyone else viewing this and having similar questions, I invite you to read and post in the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f16/ subforum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top