Discrete or continuous spectrum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of the multiplication operator M defined on the Hilbert space L²(ℝ) with a piecewise continuous function f: ℝ → ℝ. It establishes that the spectrum of M can simultaneously exhibit discrete and continuous components, exemplified by the function f(x) = {x-1 if x ≤ 0, 0 if x > 0}, resulting in the spectrum being (-∞, -1] ∪ {0}. Additionally, it confirms that eigenvectors corresponding to M can possess finite norms, as demonstrated by the eigenvector g(x) = {0 if x ≤ 0, 1 if 0 < x < 1, 0 if x ≥ 1}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert spaces and their properties
  • Knowledge of self-adjoint operators and their spectra
  • Familiarity with multiplication operators in functional analysis
  • Concept of eigenvalues and eigenvectors in the context of operators
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of self-adjoint operators in Hilbert spaces
  • Explore the concept of spectra in functional analysis
  • Learn about piecewise continuous functions and their applications in operator theory
  • Investigate the implications of finite norm eigenvectors in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of functional analysis who are interested in operator theory, particularly those exploring the nature of spectra in Hilbert spaces.

ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,802
Reaction score
605
Consider an unbounded self-adjoint operator defined in a hilbert space(its domain isn't the entire hilbert space,of course).Can its spectrum have discrete and continuous parts simultaneity?Does it have eigenvectors with finite norm?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a "nice" (for example: piecewise continuous) function [itex]f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex]. We can consider the multiplication operator

[tex]M:L^2(\mathbb{R})\rightarrow L^2(\mathbb{R}): g\rightarrow fg[/tex]

An element ##\lambda\in \mathbb{C}## is not in the spectrum of ##M## if and only if ##M-\lambda I## is not invertible. But we have

[tex](M-\lambda I)(g)(x) = f(x)g(x) - \lambda g(x) = ( f(x) - \lambda 1) g(x)[/tex]

We can see from this (and we can prove), that ##M-\lambda I## is invertible only if ##f(x)\neq \lambda## for any ##x\in \mathbb{R}##. So the spectrum of ##M## is ##\overline(f(\mathbb{R}))##.

Now take for example, the function

[tex]f(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{l}x-1 ~\text{if}~ x\leq 0\\ 0~\text{if} ~x>0\end{array}\right.[/tex]

Then the spectrum will be ##(-\infty,-1]\cup \{0\}##, which consists of "continuous" and "discrete parts".

Now, ##g## is an eigenvalue of ##M## if ##Mg = \lambda g## for a certain ##\lambda\in \mathbb{C}##. So ##f(x)g(x) = \lambda g(x)## for all ##x\in \mathbb{R}##.

If we take the function ##f##as above, then we see that

[tex]g(x) = \left\{\begin{array}{l} 0~\text{if} ~x\leq 0\\ 1~\text{if}~ 0<x<1\\ 0~\text{if}~ x\geq 1\end{array}\right.[/tex]

is an eigenvector. Furthermore, this has finite norm.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
7K