This claim is supposed to be true. Assume that [itex]p\in\mathbb{F}[X][/itex] is an irreducible polynomial over a field [itex]\mathbb{F}\subset\mathbb{C}[/itex]. Also assume that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

p(X)=(X-z_1)\cdots (X-z_N)

[/tex]

holds with some [itex]z_1,\ldots, z_N\in\mathbb{C}[/itex]. Now all [itex]z_1,\ldots, z_N[/itex] are distinct.

Why is this claim true?

For example, if [itex]z_1=z_2[/itex], then [itex](X-z_1)^2[/itex] divides [itex]p[/itex], but I see no reason to assume that [itex](X-z_1)^2\in\mathbb{F}[X][/itex], so the claim remains a mystery to me.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Distinct zeros of irreducible polynomial

Loading...

Similar Threads - Distinct zeros irreducible | Date |
---|---|

I Getting a matrix into row-echelon form, with zero-value pivots | Feb 17, 2018 |

I Distinctiveness of the set of nxn matrices as a ring | Apr 5, 2017 |

Counting the distinct values of a modular mapping | Jun 22, 2014 |

Groups of prime order structurally distinct? | Oct 16, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**