This claim is supposed to be true. Assume that [itex]p\in\mathbb{F}[X][/itex] is an irreducible polynomial over a field [itex]\mathbb{F}\subset\mathbb{C}[/itex]. Also assume that(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]

p(X)=(X-z_1)\cdots (X-z_N)

[/tex]

holds with some [itex]z_1,\ldots, z_N\in\mathbb{C}[/itex]. Now all [itex]z_1,\ldots, z_N[/itex] are distinct.

Why is this claim true?

For example, if [itex]z_1=z_2[/itex], then [itex](X-z_1)^2[/itex] divides [itex]p[/itex], but I see no reason to assume that [itex](X-z_1)^2\in\mathbb{F}[X][/itex], so the claim remains a mystery to me.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Distinct zeros of irreducible polynomial

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**