Distinguish between positron and proton

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter blue_leaf77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positron Proton
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around distinguishing between protons and positrons in a cloud chamber, focusing on their behavior under specific conditions such as energy loss and magnetic fields. Participants explore various methods for identification, including energy loss per distance and the effects of momentum on particle trajectories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that if protons and positrons undergo the same energy loss while traversing a lead plate, their momentum and trajectory will differ afterward.
  • Another participant counters that protons and positrons will not necessarily experience the same energy loss, which could aid in their identification.
  • It is proposed that applying a uniform magnetic field would help distinguish the two particles due to their different bending behaviors, although there is contention regarding the effects at the same momentum.
  • Concerns are raised about the energy loss rates of protons versus positrons, particularly at low momenta, with some arguing that protons lose energy faster than positrons.
  • Discussion includes the Bethe formula, which describes energy loss per distance for nonrelativistic particles, noting that slower particles lose more energy per distance.
  • Participants explore how the shape of the tracks in the chamber may differ based on the mass and energy loss characteristics of the particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the methods for distinguishing protons from positrons, with multiple competing views on energy loss, momentum effects, and track shapes remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding energy loss, momentum, and the effects of magnetic fields, but these assumptions are not universally agreed upon and may depend on specific experimental conditions.

blue_leaf77
Science Advisor
Messages
2,637
Reaction score
786
Probably a basic question in this field but I haven't been able to find the answer upon internet search.
Suppose I send a beam consisting of protons and positrons with a given momentum into a cloud chamber, how can then I tell them apart?

My own rough guess:
Suppose the two particles undergo the same amount of energy loss upon traversing the lead plate inside the chamber then the momentum after the plate will be ##p_i' = \sqrt{p_i^2 - 2m_i \Delta E}## where ##i = 1,2## denoting the indices of each particle and ##\Delta E## is the energy loss. ##p## is the initial momentum which is the same for both particle. Hence the radius of the trajectory is different after the plate despite the are the same before traversing it. Is it true?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
blue_leaf77 said:
Suppose the two particles undergo the same amount of energy loss upon traversing the lead plate inside the chamber
In general they won't. Which is a good way to identify them.

Their energy loss per distance in the cloud chamber is different as well, so their tracks will look different.

What is the rough energy scale of your particles?
 
Why not applying a uniform magnetic field? That way the distinction will become clear, because positrons and protons will bend differently as long as the momenta are not very large.
 
ChrisVer said:
Why not applying a uniform magnetic field? That way the distinction will become clear, because positrons and protons will bend differently as long as the momenta are not very large.
At the same momentum, they will bend exactly in the same way. Which is probably the way blue_leaf77 measures their momentum.
 
Well if the momenta are small enough then, the proton will lose energy [and momentum] much faster than the positron ?
 
mfb said:
At the same momentum, they will bend exactly in the same way. Which is probably the way blue_leaf77 measures their momentum.
Yes that's exactly the thing that confuses me. So, more precisely in which way do they differ in their track due to the difference of energy loss per distance? If this loss is due to collisions with the cloud's molecules then I guess the lighter particle will easily lose its energy as compared to the heavier one? If for the moment I remove the lead plate, then the particle with smaller energy loss (heavy ones) will form bigger spiral while those with bigger energy loss (lighter ones) will form a faster sinking spiral?
ChrisVer said:
the proton will lose energy [and momentum] much faster than the positron ?
Not the other way around?
 
Last edited:
Slower nonrelativistic particles lose more energy per distance. This is described with the Bethe formula (and some corrections for very slow particles). At the same momentum, protons are slower.

Faster highly relativistic particles lose more energy per distance, but the momentum-dependence in this region is weaker. Other interactions become more interesting here, like bremsstrahlung of the positron.

What is the rough energy scale of your particles?
 
mfb said:
What is the rough energy scale of your particles?
This problem simply popped up in my mind during the class though, it has no relation to any real problem I'm facing.
mfb said:
Slower nonrelativistic particles lose more energy per distance. This is described with the Bethe formula (and some corrections for very slow particles). At the same momentum, protons are slower.
So, what's the difference in their track shape inside the chamber?
 
Slower nonrelativistic particles will make thicker tracks. The track length (if the chamber is large enough) will depend on the mass as well, but that relation is a bit more complicated. If the tracking is sensitive enough, you might be able to see the energy loss (=>smaller radius in the magnetic field) which gives an additional indication of the particle type.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: blue_leaf77

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
861
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K