Dittus Boelter coefficient M range

  • Thread starter Thread starter Martin Beer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coefficient Range
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Dittus-Boelter correlation for Nusselt number can yield a coefficient M related to Reynolds number (Re) that exceeds 1, as evidenced by a reported value of 1.12 in a recent discussion. While it is conceptually possible to achieve an M value greater than 1, empirical data predominantly suggests values around 0.8. This discrepancy raises questions about the physical implications of such coefficients in heat transfer applications. Recommended literature for further exploration includes "Transport Phenomena" by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dittus-Boelter correlation
  • Familiarity with Nusselt number calculations
  • Knowledge of Reynolds number (Re) significance
  • Basic principles of heat transfer
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Dittus-Boelter correlation in detail
  • Research empirical data on M values in heat transfer
  • Learn about the implications of Nusselt number in thermal systems
  • Read "Transport Phenomena" by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, researchers, and students in thermal engineering or fluid dynamics who are analyzing heat transfer coefficients and their implications in practical applications.

Martin Beer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am doing Dittus Boelter correlation for Nusselt number accroding to my measured data. Coefficient (or constant) M that is related to Re has (in my case) value of 1.12. Is it physically possible to get value greater than 1? In my previous research, I've only met with a value of less than one, so I am little bit confused. Thanks for answer.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Martin Beer said:
Hello, I am doing Dittus Boelter correlation for Nusselt number accroding to my measured data. Coefficient (or constant) M that is related to Re has (in my case) value of 1.12. Is it physically possible to get value greater than 1? In my previous research, I've only met with a value of less than one, so I am little bit confused. Thanks for answer.
In my judgment, it is conceptually possible to get an exponent greater than 1. In practice, as you know, there is abundant data that indicates that it is about 0.8.
 
Thank you for your answer, I really appreciate it. Could you recommend some suitable literature for me to learn more about it?
 
Martin Beer said:
Thank you for your answer, I really appreciate it. Could you recommend some suitable literature for me to learn more about it?
Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
977
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K