MHB Divide into 5 congruent pieces

  • Thread starter Thread starter I like Serena
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on dividing a geometric figure into five congruent pieces, building on a previous example of dividing it into four. Participants confirm the feasibility of this division, with one user acknowledging the proposed solution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of geometric principles in achieving congruence. Visual representations are used to illustrate the division process. The thread concludes with a positive reinforcement of the solution provided.
I like Serena
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
MHB
Messages
16,335
Reaction score
258
The following shows how a figure can be divided into 4 congruent pieces.
How can we divide the same figure into 5 congruent pieces?
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[ultra thick] (0,0) -- (4,0) -- (4,2) -- (3,3) -- (4,4) -- (0,4) -- (-1,3) -- (0,2) -- cycle;
\draw (0,2) -- (1,3) -- (2,2) -- (2,4);
\draw (4,2) -- (3,1) -- (2,2) -- (1,1) -- (2,0);
\end{tikzpicture}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org

Attachments

  • o.jpg
    o.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 122
Last edited by a moderator:
Indeed. That is the solution maxkor.
Well done!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top