Divide number into 3 parts with each part being 1.6 times greater than the last

  • Thread starter Thread starter CF.Gauss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    parts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around dividing the number 90 into three parts where each part is 1.6 times greater than the previous one. The mathematical representation is established as x + 1.6x + 1.6²x = 90, where x represents the first part. Participants emphasize the importance of guiding the original poster (OP) towards understanding the solution rather than providing direct answers. The conversation highlights the balance between offering assistance and encouraging independent problem-solving.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of algebraic expressions and equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of geometric progression
  • Basic knowledge of factorization techniques
  • Ability to perform arithmetic operations with variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study algebraic manipulation techniques for solving equations
  • Explore geometric sequences and their properties
  • Learn about factorization methods in algebra
  • Practice solving similar problems involving ratios and proportions
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in algebra and mathematical reasoning.

CF.Gauss
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
A friend posed this just for fun but now its really annoying me.

how do you divide 90 into three parts so that each part is 1.6 times greater than the last.
i.e: the second value should be 1.6 times greater than the first and the third value should be 1.6 times greater than the second?

Im confusing myself with this.
Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi CF.Gauss. Just write it as x + 1.6 x + 1.6^2 x = 90 and then factorize out the "x" and simplify.
 
uart said:
Hi CF.Gauss. Just write it as x + 1.6 x + 1.6^2 x = 90 and then factorize out the "x" and simplify.

Hm ... I thought the goal here was to help people think and understand things, not spoon-feed them answers. Have I got that wrong?
 
phinds said:
Hm ... I thought the goal here was to help people think and understand things, not spoon-feed them answers. Have I got that wrong?

Actually I did not give the answer, I left the factorizing and the following arithmetic for the OP to do. This is in effect the first line of what probably be a three line derivation for the OP.

I agree though that it does give away a large part of the overall solution. Sometimes with such a simple question it's hard to know how to give the OP a "start" without giving away too much. :smile:

BTW. To me this looked more like a curiosity question than homework anyway, though of course I don't know that for sure.
 
Last edited:
uart said:
Actually I did not give the answer, I left the factorizing and the following arithmetic for the OP to do. This is in effect the first line of what probably be a three line derivation for the OP.

I agree though that it does give away a large part of the overall solution. Sometimes with such a simple question it's hard to know how to give the OP a "start" without giving away too much. :smile:

BTW. To me this looked more like a curiosity question than homework anyway, though of course I don't know that for sure.

Yeah, I can't argue w/ that. Still, I was going to try to lead him to an equation rather than give it to him.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
845
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K