Dividing both sides by a Dirac delta function - ok?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical implications of dividing both sides of an equation by a Dirac delta function. It establishes that if the relation f(x)δ(x-x') = g(x)δ(x-x') holds true for all x', one can conclude that f(x) = g(x) for all x. This conclusion is supported by integrating the relation over an interval containing x and applying the definition of the delta function, confirming the equality of the functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac delta function properties
  • Knowledge of distribution theory in mathematics
  • Familiarity with integration techniques involving delta functions
  • Basic concepts of functional equality in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Dirac delta function in detail
  • Learn about distribution theory and its applications in physics
  • Explore integration techniques involving delta functions in various contexts
  • Investigate functional analysis and the implications of functional equality
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying advanced calculus or distribution theory who seek to understand the implications of using Dirac delta functions in equations.

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
Suppose I wind up with the relation

[tex]f(x)\delta (x-x')=g(x)\delta (x-x')[/tex]

true for all x'.

Can I safely conclude that f(x) = g(x) (for all x)? Or am I overlooking something? this is a little too close to dividing both sides by zero for comfort.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You could integrate your relation over any interval containing x, and use the definition of the delta function (or rather, distribution):

If
[tex] f(x)\delta (x-x')=g(x)\delta (x-x')[/tex]
then
[tex]\int_{x - \epsilon}^{x + \epsilon} f(x)\delta (x-x') \, \mathrm{d}x' = \int_{x - \epsilon}^{x + \epsilon} g(x)\delta (x-x') \, \mathrm{d}x'[/tex]
which evaluates (by definition of the delta) to
[tex]f(x) = g(x)[/tex]
 
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K