Do Finite Sets Really Lack Limit Points?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 2K views
dalcde
Messages
164
Reaction score
0
Is it true that finite sets don't have limit points?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it depends on what topology u use on the unversal set
 
The real numbers and the Euclidean metric.
 
Yes, in any metric space, a finite set has no limit points. A point p is a limit point of set A if and only if, for any [itex]\delta> 0[/itex], there exist a point, q, of A other than p such that [itex]d(p,q)< \delta[/itex]. If A is a finite set, then there exist a "shortest" distance between points: M= min(d(p,q)) where the minimum is take over all pairs of points in A. Taking [itex]\delta[/itex] to be smaller than M shows that A cannot have any limit points.
 
with the eucliden metric on R we can deduct the standard topology on R which is a Hausdorff space so the set of limit points is close in R
 
Not true in general for topological spaces. For example, for any set X with the indiscrete topology [itex]\{\emptyset,X\}[/itex], every point is a limit point of every set with at least two elements.

But it's true for every T1 topological space. This means that for any two distinct points x and y, there is an open set containing x but not y.