DarMM
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 2,369
- 1,408
That's interesting, I wasn't much of a fan of Wallace's book. I found it mixed the mathematics and prose in a very odd way. Often assumptions for the theorems appear much earlier in an unassuming form in the prose.
For decoherent histories I found Omnès far better.
Of course this is just taste.
For decoherent histories I found Omnès far better.
Of course this is just taste.