Studying Do I need to learn more math as a physics autodidact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ahmed1029
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the approach to studying mathematics in relation to physics after mastering foundational topics such as calculus, linear algebra, and differential equations. The consensus suggests that for someone primarily interested in physics, it is beneficial to learn mathematics as a tool through physics textbooks, supplemented by resources specifically designed for physicists, rather than delving into specialized math textbooks. This approach is applicable at both undergraduate and graduate levels. It emphasizes the importance of contextual learning, where mathematical concepts are integrated within the framework of physical applications, making it easier to grasp their relevance and utility.
Ahmed1029
Messages
109
Reaction score
40
I managed to master the single variable, multivariable, and vector calculus, linear algebra, and some ordinary differential equations. After that, I studied advanced advanced introductions to classical mechanics and electrodynamics. I'm currently studying waves and oscillations and don't intend to stop somewhere. My question then is whether from now I should only study the physics textbooks and learn the math I need through physics, or learn math from specialized math textbooks.
Is the answer the same for both undergraduate and graduate level books?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ahmed1029 said:
My question then is whether from now I should only study the physics textbooks and learn the math I need through physics,
In general, now you have all the basics, this is probably the better approach.
Ahmed1029 said:
or learn math from specialized math textbooks.
Only now and again if it's something you need to nail down thoroughly. Note, however, that it's often difficult to relate the material in specialized maths books (e.g. Lie Groups and Lie Algebras) to the application of that mathematics to physics.
 
Ahmed1029 said:
I managed to master the single variable, multivariable, and vector calculus, linear algebra, and some ordinary differential equations. After that, I studied advanced advanced introductions to classical mechanics and electrodynamics. I'm currently studying waves and oscillations and don't intend to stop somewhere. My question then is whether from now I should only study the physics textbooks and learn the math I need through physics, or learn math from specialized math textbooks.
Is the answer the same for both undergraduate and graduate level books?
If your primary interest is physics, then you should view math as a tool for physics. Learn the math you need from physics books, supplemented by books geared towards "math for physicists (scientists, engineers)" rather than books geared towards math for mathematicians. This holds for undergrad and grad.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and Ahmed1029
Thank you guys your answers are such a relief!
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
653
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top