Do Modern Circuit Boards Use Full or Partial Shielding Techniques?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeff1evesque
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit Pcb
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the shielding techniques used in modern circuit boards, specifically whether full or partial shielding is employed. Participants explore concepts related to electromagnetic interference and the effectiveness of different shielding methods.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of ground planes and metal shields for specific components, questioning the effectiveness of these methods. There is an exploration of Faraday's cage principles and how they relate to PCB shielding, along with inquiries about the practical limitations of shielding at various frequencies.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the complexities of shielding techniques. Some have shared personal experiences and knowledge, while others are seeking clarification on specific concepts, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention challenges related to achieving perfect conductivity and the implications of small imperfections in shielding. There are references to the practical difficulties of implementing shielding in circuit design, as well as the need for power and signal management within enclosures.

jeff1evesque
Messages
312
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was wondering if circuit boards today that encorporate shielding do so by covering the entire circuit with a conductor (like faradays cage), or if it can be done by simply coating the backside of the circuit with some conducting layer.

Jeffrey Levesque
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You typically cover the backside of a circuit board with a single layer - the ground plane. This helps with interference, although you can create problems if noise from one part of the circuit is coupled through the ground plane to another more sensitive part.

On the component side you can cover individual components or small areas with metal shields, normally for high frequency parts like RF tuners.
 
Are you familiar with faraday's cage? From my limited knowledge, I gather the reasoning that any enclosed conducting volume has zero charge within it (due to the electric field being zero along the equipotential surface, and thus the by Gauss law the enclosed charge being zero). Is faraday's cage (even gauss law) similar at all to the concept of these PCB's with their (one-sided) shield?
 
That is correct, there is no field inside a sealed, grounded ideal conductor.
However in practice they don't work quite as well. It's difficult to be a perfect conductor at frequencies from 50Hz to 5GHz, at higher frequencies any small hole will allow some signal in (or out) and they don't shield magnetic fields at all. Additionally any current induced in part of the screen will generate a filed inside as will any sparks due to breaks in the conducting surface.
Then you have the problem of getting power and signal in/out of the enclosure.

Wrapping aliminium foil around a PCB won't magically make it immune to interference.
 
mgb_phys said:
That is correct, there is no field inside a sealed, grounded ideal conductor.
However in practice they don't work quite as well. It's difficult to be a perfect conductor at frequencies from 50Hz to 5GHz, at higher frequencies any small hole will allow some signal in (or out) and they don't shield magnetic fields at all. Additionally any current induced in part of the screen will generate a filed inside as will any sparks due to breaks in the conducting surface.
Then you have the problem of getting power and signal in/out of the enclosure.

Wrapping aliminium foil around a PCB won't magically make it immune to interference.

I briefly talked to a professor today, and he said something about the plate is locally polarized, but the electric field doesn't really penetrate the shield. Do you know why the shield doesn't act like a parallel plate capacitor (in a small localized region)? Because if you have some charge outside the shield, then the electric field will cancel inside the shield, while the electric field from the applied charge will exist on the opposite side (only along the localized region).
 
A shield is different from a capacitor, both sides are connected together.
If you have a break in the sheild then two parts of it can have different voltages and a field will exist between them.
 
Jeff, I googled PCB Shielding, and got lots of good tutorial hits. Here's one:

http://mwrf.com/Articles/ArticleID/5430/5430.html

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
943
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K