- 32,814
- 4,726
anuj said:I started this thread in view of an article I read in Scientific American, Sept. 2004 issue. Two expt., ATHENA and ATRAP, at CERN are underway to test the spectroscopic properties of hydrogen and antihydrogen atom (see the SA issue). The experiments are conducted to test the CPT violation and consequently the Lorentz violation.
If we are so sure about the physics of particle-antiparticle then why do we need to test the CPT. Do we expect an atom to behave differently then an antiatom or matter as compared to antimatter (any comments ZZ)?
In a semiconductor, the position of a hole is below Fermi energy level whereas electron is above it. In contrast, the position of a Positron is below 0 i.e. -ve energy where as an electron has +ve energy. That is why electron-hole pair results in radiation of few eV, while electron-positron recombination results in a high energy radiation. Although the physics (explanation) of electron-hole looks similar to electron-positron, one really need to prove the similarities experimentally.
Is there any experimental proof where a large number of electrons and positrons are trapped and made to behave as they do in a semiconductor material. What I mean to say is an electron-positron recombination in vacuum results in emission of radiation following the Einstein's mass energy eqn. Can we experimentally prove that in a many body problem involving actual electrons and positrons, their recombination will be according to electron-hole recombination process.
What you are asking here now is a COMPLETELY different issue. It would have been clearer what your intentions were had you put your question within this context, rather than just asking a blanket question if we know anything about particles and antiparticles.
Let's narrow this down to a important issues:
1. We KNOW very well how particles and antiparticles behave according to our physical laws.
2. We however do NOT know why there are more matter than antimatter in this universe of ours.
That last part is one of the reason why there are ongoing studies on certain rare decay events, such as the Kaons, that exhibit the so-called CP violation (I even mentioned this in one of my postings in this thread!). There have been several theories that link CP-violation with the apparent asymmetry between the amount of matter and antimatter. It is why people want to make antihydrogen, to see if there are more exotic properties that can be gathered.
But again, if you have missed it, let me emphasize that these are VERY rare events. And the fact that we CAN detect such things and know when a CP violating event occurs implies that we know how these particles (and antiparticles) should behave. So asking if we know anything about them makes it rather strange. We HAVE to know something about them to know what properties to measure!
There is a misconception here that seems to think that just because we continue to study on something, that we know nothing about it. We know enough to know what we're looking for. However, we don't know everything (and in my opinion, never will). The work of physicists has always been "OK, we know that works here. Let's see what happens there!" It has always been the expansion of our current boundary of knowledge. Antihydrogen has not been studied before - so we study them and try to figure out if they are any different. As physicists, we won't be happy JUST having some theory or someone tells us that they should behave the same way - we want to TEST them ourselves and make sure!
But this is waaaay different than making a claim that our laws do not work on these things.
Zz.