Do the eigenfunctions for the position operator form an orthogonal set?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the eigenfunctions of the position operator and their orthogonality. It clarifies that while the eigenfunctions can appear arbitrary, they must adhere to specific mathematical properties, particularly in the context of Hermitian operators. The confusion arises from treating the eigenvalue and operator interchangeably, leading to the conclusion that the only valid eigenfunctions are Dirac delta distributions, which are not square integrable. The conversation emphasizes the need for a deeper understanding of concepts like rigged Hilbert spaces and self-adjointness to fully grasp the implications of eigenfunctions in quantum mechanics. A recommendation is made to consult more rigorous mathematical texts for clarity on these advanced topics.
Runner 1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Starting with,

\hat{X}\psi = x\psi

then,

x\psi = x\psi

\psi = \psi

So the eigenfunctions for this operator can equal anything (as long as they keep \hat{X} linear and Hermitian), right?

Well, McQuarrie says that "the eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator are orthogonal", which can be checked with:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi^*_m \psi_n\, dx = \langle m | n \rangle = 0

But if the eigenfunctions can be anything, then that integral won't always equal zero. What am I missing here?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So, you're messing up because you're using x as both the eigenvalue and the operator X. The correct equation should look like:

\hat{X}\psi=y\psi

We can't know a priori that the eigenfunction \psi has eigenvalue x, so we must use y as the eigenvalue.

Therefore

x\psi=y\psi

And

(x-y)\psi=0

Let's make the notation better still:

(x-y)\psi_y(x)=0

So, our wave function is a function of x, and it has eigenvalue y for the x-operator.

What "function" can make this true for arbitrary x and y? Well, actually there is no function that can make this true for arbitrary x and y other than the trivial \psi=0 function but this is the trivial case. In fact, x has no "eigenfunctions" in the strict sense of the word "function". The only thing that could make that above equality work is:

\psi_y(x)=\delta(x-y)

Now you notice that this is STILL not square integrable, however, it IS orthogonal in some sense:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi_y(x)\psi_z(x)dx=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(x-y)\delta(x-z)dx=\delta(y-z)

This is the best that we can do. The eigenfunctions of x (and p) are not actually within the Hilbert space.
 
If X acts on wavefunctions of L2(R) as a multiplication through the real number x, then one can show that X is self-adjoint on his domain of definition. Then by the spectral theorem of Gelfand-Kostyuchenko-Maurin, an extension of it has a complete set of eigenfunctions is a rigged Hilbert space built over L2(R). The eigenfunctions are the Dirac delta distributions.
 
dextercioby said:
If X acts on wavefunctions of L2(R) as a multiplication through the real number x, then one can show that X is self-adjoint on his domain of definition. Then by the spectral theorem of Gelfand-Kostyuchenko-Maurin, an extension of it has a complete set of eigenfunctions is a rigged Hilbert space built over L2(R). The eigenfunctions are the Dirac delta distributions.

Thanks, but...Your explanation

|
|
|
|
|
|

My headI think I'm going to have to find a more mathematically rigorous textbook on the subject as mine doesn't discuss Hilbert spaces, self-adjointness, or that spectral theorem.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K