Do up and down quarks obey flavour quantum conservation?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of "upness" and its relation to isospin and flavor symmetries in the QCD Lagrangian. It is concluded that "upness" is conserved in strong interactions due to the diagonal nature of the Lagrangian in flavor space. However, in electroweak interactions, this conservation may be broken.
  • #1
Chaste
63
0
I was searching for a "upness" over the internet and found nothing but what hints of up and down quarks having quantum number conservation is this isospin thing, which I haven't learnt.

May I ask if there is an "upness" or "downness"?

i.e number of up quarks - number of antiup quarks for upness.

and if there is, then what is the value for upness quantum number... +1 or -1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is just isospin which is strictly speaking +1/2 and -1/2 and which is conserved in strong interactions. Going to three quarks and including the s quark one indeed talks about strangeness, but for u and d it's isospin.
 
  • #3
My group theory knowledge is a little rusty, so perhaps you can clarify.

Naively, if I look at the QCD Lagrangian, it would appear that there is a U(1) symmetry corresponding to multiplying the up quark field by a phase that would correspond to conservation of "upness". Thus, I would either expect that "upness" really is conserved--i.e., that the U(1) is a subgroup of larger isospin symmetry, or some combination of isospin and the baryon number U(1). Otherwise, if "upness" is not a conserved quantity, there must be an anomaly that breaks the symmetry of the QCD action (presumably the axial anomaly, but from my limited knowledge of group theory, it doesn't seem like it should be related to the above-mentioned U(1) that I think would correspond to a transformation that acts equally on right and left handed up quarks.)

Or perhaps I'm way off. I haven't thought about this stuff in a long time. Any clarification would be appreciated.
 
  • #4
The QCD Lagrangian has a global N flavor symmetry; for N=2 this is just SU(2), not U(1). In addition it has a local color SU(3) symmetry which is not relevant here.

In QCD the SU(2) isospin symmetry is nearly exact; it is broken only by slightly different masses of u- and d-quarks. For high energy processes massless quarks with exact isospin symmetry may be a good approximation.

In el.-weak interactions (which we do not discuss here) the u- and d-quarks couple via W-bosons; this is by no means an anomaly but already present at tree level.
 
  • #5
tom.stoer said:
The QCD Lagrangian has a global N flavor symmetry; for N=2 this is just SU(2), not U(1). In addition it has a local color SU(3) symmetry which is not relevant here.

In QCD the SU(2) isospin symmetry is nearly exact; it is broken only by slightly different masses of u- and d-quarks. For high energy processes massless quarks with exact isospin symmetry may be a good approximation.

Yes, I am aware that if the mass of the up and down are the same, there is as SU(2) symmetry (actually U(2), or SU(2)xU(1), which is why I mentioned baryon number).

If we ignore the down quark for the moment, I can multiply just the up quark by a phase, and I believe the QCD action is unchanged. (Are you saying this is not correct?) If this is correct (and if the symmetry is not anomolous) then "upness" should be conserved. Of course, I assume it must just be part of a larger symmetry, since no one ever talks about "upness" by itself. From memory, I thought I remembered that there are U(1) subgroups of SU(2), and the natural assumption is that the "upness" U(1) is just part of the isospin SU(2), although, again, my memory of group theory is hazy. Of course, even if this is true, it's more useful to use the full isospin symmetry than to pay attention to upness by itself, but it's still interesting to note the relationships between the symmetries.

Is there something wrong with my reasoning?

*Edit* Yes, I think you are right about the electroweak interactions, which would break any "upness" conservation in QCD. I'm still curious about the case where you just consider the strong interactions, though.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
I think it's true that "upness" is conserved in strong interactions. Let upness, U, be the number of up quarks minus the number of anti-ups. Then [itex]U=I_z+(3/2)B[/itex], where Iz is the z-component of isospin and B is the baryon number. Since Iz and B are conserved, so is U.

Probably the reason people prefer to talk about isospin rather than upness is that you also have conservation of I(I+1), which isn't implied by conservation of U.
 
  • #7
In QCD all flavors are conserved independently. This is due to the fact that the Lagrangian

[tex]\bar{q}_f \gamma^\mu D_\mu q_f[/tex]

as a sum over all flavors is diagonal in flavor space, that means that the strong interactions mediated by the gluons in [tex]\gamma^\mu D_\mu[/tex] does not mix flavors. Mathematically this is simply

[tex]\bar{q}_f \gamma^\mu D_\mu q_f = \bar{q}_{f} (\gamma^\mu D_\mu)_{ff^\prime} q_{f^\prime} [/tex]
 
  • #8
Thanks. It's all clear to me now.
 

1. What is flavour quantum conservation?

Flavour quantum conservation is a fundamental principle in particle physics that states that the total number of each type of quark must remain constant in any interaction or decay process. In other words, the total number of up, down, charm, strange, top, and bottom quarks must remain the same before and after the interaction.

2. What are up and down quarks?

Up and down quarks are two of the six types of quarks that make up the building blocks of matter. They are the lightest and most common types of quarks, with up quarks having a charge of +2/3 and down quarks having a charge of -1/3. They are found in the protons and neutrons that make up the nucleus of an atom.

3. How do up and down quarks obey flavour quantum conservation?

Up and down quarks obey flavour quantum conservation by always appearing or disappearing in pairs. This means that if an interaction produces a new up quark, it must also produce a new down quark, and vice versa. This ensures that the total number of up and down quarks remains constant.

4. Why is flavour quantum conservation important?

Flavour quantum conservation is important because it helps explain the stability of matter and the behavior of elementary particles. It also allows scientists to accurately predict the outcomes of particle interactions and decays.

5. Are there any exceptions to flavour quantum conservation?

Yes, there are rare processes in which flavour quantum conservation appears to be violated. However, these processes are still being studied and are not yet fully understood. Additionally, some theories, such as supersymmetry, allow for temporary violations of flavour quantum conservation before the balance is restored.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
879
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top