AgentPancake
- 9
- 0
I'd go with before
The discussion revolves around preferences for music from before or after the 21st century, exploring various opinions on the quality, evolution, and personal significance of music across different eras. Participants share their experiences and preferences, touching on historical context and generational perspectives.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether music from before or after the 21st century is preferable. Multiple competing views remain, with some favoring earlier music and others advocating for contemporary sounds.
Participants express varying definitions of "before" and "after," with some referencing specific decades and others considering broader historical contexts. The discussion reflects personal biases and generational perspectives that may influence opinions on music quality.
Jimmy Snyder said:From what I've heard of 21st century music so far, I would say after.
KingNothing said:How about during?
Every generation eventually comes to think that "the music nowadays is crap compared to what we had when I was younger...". It's more a matter of people getting old, stubborn, and closed-minded. Music is always changing, usually faster than a person's preferences can change.
micromass said:I don't agree. The music when I was younger was crap. The music is still crap
I wish I lived in the 60's or 70's. That times seemed so much more exciting...