Does a linearly time varying B create changing E?

AI Thread Summary
Accelerated charges produce time-varying electric fields, which in turn create time-varying magnetic fields. The discussion explores the relationship between linearly time-varying magnetic fields and electric fields, emphasizing that a changing magnetic field can lead to a non-zero curl of the electric field. A specific example involving charged parallel plates illustrates how the electric field can increase quadratically over time while the magnetic field increases linearly. Despite the electric field being straight, it can still have a non-zero curl due to spatial variation. The conversation highlights the interconnectedness of electric and magnetic fields as described by Maxwell's equations.
Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
I know that a time varying magnetic field, creates a curling electric field around it. My question is this: If the time variance is linear, the curl of electric field is constant. Doesn't that imply electric field is not varying with time? So, no curling magnetic field is generated?
Relevant Equations
Maxwell's 4 laws
As accelerated charges produces time varying electric field which produces time varying magnetic fields and so on. I know there is something wrong with my argument, I can't point it out. Please be kind to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{b}(\mathbf{x})t where \nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} = 0. Hence in the absence of sources, <br /> (\nabla \times \mathbf{b})t = \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} so that <br /> \mathbf{E} = \frac{c^2t^2}{2} (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) + \mathbf{E}_0(\mathbf{x}). From <br /> \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{b} we find <br /> \frac{c^2t^2}{2}\nabla \times( \nabla\times \mathbf{b}) = - \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_0 - \mathbf{b}. Now the right hand side is independent of time, so we must have <br /> \nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) = 0 and \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_0 = -\mathbf{b} with \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}_0 = 0.

This can admit non-zero solutions for \nabla \times \mathbf{b} so that \mathbf{E} need not be independent of time.
 
  • Like
Likes Shreya and TSny
@pasmith, thank you so much for the answer. I understood your reply except the last statement.
pasmith said:
This can admit non-zero solutions for ∇×b so that E need not be independent of time.
Could you please explain this?
Could you explain how a changing magnetic field, creates a change electric field and that creates a changing magnetic field and so one. I thought that every time you take a derivative the power of time decreases until you get a zero.
P.s I am just a highschooler so I am not very comfortable with multivariable calculus, but I can quite understand what you wrote above. Could you please elaborate?
 
Shreya said:
Homework Statement: I know that a time varying magnetic field, creates a curling electric field around it. My question is this: If the time variance is linear, the curl of electric field is constant. Doesn't that imply electric field is not varying with time? So, no curling magnetic field is generated?

For a specific example, consider the ##E## and ##B## fields produced by charging parallel, circular plates:

1691948474577.png

The lower plate is being charged positive while the upper plate is being charged negative. Neglecting edge effects, the E field is parallel to the z-axis and is increasing in strength while the ##B## field lines are circular. We assume that the rate of charging is controlled such that the magnitude of ##B## at any point increases linearly with time. Then the ##E## field turns out to be nonuniform in space and increases quadratically in time. The magnitudes of the fields may be expressed as $$E = at^2 + \frac{ar^2}{2c^2}$$ $$B = \frac{art}{c^2} .$$ Here, ##a## is a constant with dimensions of electric field divided by time squared.
##r## is the horizontal distance of a point from the z-axis.

It can be checked that these fields satisfy all 4 of Maxwell’s equations. ##B## increases linearly with time. ##E## contains a time-dependent term (quadratic in ##t##) which is uniform in space and a time-independent term that is nonuniform in space (quadratic in ##r##). These two terms correspond to the right-hand side of @pasmith 's
pasmith said:
$$\mathbf{E} = \frac{c^2t^2}{2} (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) + \mathbf{E}_0(\mathbf{x})$$

In the figure, you can see how the ##B## field “curls” around the changing E field.

Even though the ##E## field lines are straight, the ##E## field nevertheless has a nonzero curl (in the mathematical sense) around the changing ##B## field. This is due to the increase in ##E## as ##r## increases.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman, vanhees71 and Shreya
Wow! Thank you so much, @TSny and @pasmith. I got it, now! I love electromagnetism and this awesome community 👏
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top