Does a linearly time varying B create changing E?

AI Thread Summary
Accelerated charges produce time-varying electric fields, which in turn create time-varying magnetic fields. The discussion explores the relationship between linearly time-varying magnetic fields and electric fields, emphasizing that a changing magnetic field can lead to a non-zero curl of the electric field. A specific example involving charged parallel plates illustrates how the electric field can increase quadratically over time while the magnetic field increases linearly. Despite the electric field being straight, it can still have a non-zero curl due to spatial variation. The conversation highlights the interconnectedness of electric and magnetic fields as described by Maxwell's equations.
Shreya
Messages
187
Reaction score
64
Homework Statement
I know that a time varying magnetic field, creates a curling electric field around it. My question is this: If the time variance is linear, the curl of electric field is constant. Doesn't that imply electric field is not varying with time? So, no curling magnetic field is generated?
Relevant Equations
Maxwell's 4 laws
As accelerated charges produces time varying electric field which produces time varying magnetic fields and so on. I know there is something wrong with my argument, I can't point it out. Please be kind to help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have \mathbf{B} = \mathbf{b}(\mathbf{x})t where \nabla \cdot \mathbf{b} = 0. Hence in the absence of sources, <br /> (\nabla \times \mathbf{b})t = \frac{1}{c^2} \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t} so that <br /> \mathbf{E} = \frac{c^2t^2}{2} (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) + \mathbf{E}_0(\mathbf{x}). From <br /> \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\mathbf{b} we find <br /> \frac{c^2t^2}{2}\nabla \times( \nabla\times \mathbf{b}) = - \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_0 - \mathbf{b}. Now the right hand side is independent of time, so we must have <br /> \nabla \times (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) = 0 and \nabla \times \mathbf{E}_0 = -\mathbf{b} with \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \nabla \cdot \mathbf{E}_0 = 0.

This can admit non-zero solutions for \nabla \times \mathbf{b} so that \mathbf{E} need not be independent of time.
 
  • Like
Likes Shreya and TSny
@pasmith, thank you so much for the answer. I understood your reply except the last statement.
pasmith said:
This can admit non-zero solutions for ∇×b so that E need not be independent of time.
Could you please explain this?
Could you explain how a changing magnetic field, creates a change electric field and that creates a changing magnetic field and so one. I thought that every time you take a derivative the power of time decreases until you get a zero.
P.s I am just a highschooler so I am not very comfortable with multivariable calculus, but I can quite understand what you wrote above. Could you please elaborate?
 
Shreya said:
Homework Statement: I know that a time varying magnetic field, creates a curling electric field around it. My question is this: If the time variance is linear, the curl of electric field is constant. Doesn't that imply electric field is not varying with time? So, no curling magnetic field is generated?

For a specific example, consider the ##E## and ##B## fields produced by charging parallel, circular plates:

1691948474577.png

The lower plate is being charged positive while the upper plate is being charged negative. Neglecting edge effects, the E field is parallel to the z-axis and is increasing in strength while the ##B## field lines are circular. We assume that the rate of charging is controlled such that the magnitude of ##B## at any point increases linearly with time. Then the ##E## field turns out to be nonuniform in space and increases quadratically in time. The magnitudes of the fields may be expressed as $$E = at^2 + \frac{ar^2}{2c^2}$$ $$B = \frac{art}{c^2} .$$ Here, ##a## is a constant with dimensions of electric field divided by time squared.
##r## is the horizontal distance of a point from the z-axis.

It can be checked that these fields satisfy all 4 of Maxwell’s equations. ##B## increases linearly with time. ##E## contains a time-dependent term (quadratic in ##t##) which is uniform in space and a time-independent term that is nonuniform in space (quadratic in ##r##). These two terms correspond to the right-hand side of @pasmith 's
pasmith said:
$$\mathbf{E} = \frac{c^2t^2}{2} (\nabla \times \mathbf{b}) + \mathbf{E}_0(\mathbf{x})$$

In the figure, you can see how the ##B## field “curls” around the changing E field.

Even though the ##E## field lines are straight, the ##E## field nevertheless has a nonzero curl (in the mathematical sense) around the changing ##B## field. This is due to the increase in ##E## as ##r## increases.
 
  • Like
Likes kuruman, vanhees71 and Shreya
Wow! Thank you so much, @TSny and @pasmith. I got it, now! I love electromagnetism and this awesome community 👏
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top