Does a Zero Wronskian Imply Linear Dependence for Smooth Functions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Suppose I have some functions ## \{ y,y_{1},y_{2},...y_{n} \} \subset C^{∞} ## and suppose I know that the Wronskian of these functions is 0. Then can I conclude that these functions are linearly dependent?

Certainly this need not be true for an arbitrary set of functions, but it appears that it is true for analytic functions. My knowledge of these functions is very limited so I won't pursue it much, but are functions in ## C^{∞} ## considered analytic?

Thanks for the clarification.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bipolarity said:
Suppose I have some functions ## \{ y,y_{1},y_{2},...y_{n} \} \subset C^{∞} ## and suppose I know that the Wronskian of these functions is 0. Then can I conclude that these functions are linearly dependent?

Certainly this need not be true for an arbitrary set of functions, but it appears that it is true for analytic functions. My knowledge of these functions is very limited so I won't pursue it much, but are functions in ## C^{∞} ## considered analytic?

Thanks for the clarification.

BiP
Functions in ##C^{\infty}## are considered smooth, but not necessarily analytic. See here for details.

If the Wronskian is 0, the functions are not necessarily linearly dependent. For example, consider ##x^2## and ##x|x|##, the classical example given by Peano. Their Wronskian is 0, but they are clearly independent in any neighborhood of 0.