I Does antineutrino capture preferentially form neutrons?

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Besides the energetic preference (lower threshold, and more phase space above)?
Antineutrino capture is a weak process, so it can and does change quark flavour.
p+ν=n+e+
is actually
uud+ν=udd+e+
that is
u+ν=d+e+
But given enough energy (like cosmic ray neutrinos), do antineutrinos also get captured:
p+ν=Λ+e+?
Because this is just
udu+ν=uds+e+
that is
u+ν=s+e+
As you see, even though baryon charges match, a process
p+ν=Ξ+e+
would be obstructed, because Ξ has 2 s quarks. But process
p+ν=Λb+e+
should be just
u+ν=b+e+

Obviously these processes are impossible below energy threshold, and above they have a phase space factor. But at high energies, does proton conversion into n vs conversion into any specified flavour of Λ approach ratio of unity, or will any difference remain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would have different CKM matrix elements in there. And ##|V_{ud}| > |V_{us}| > |V_{ub}|##. So I would say yes, ##p+\bar{\nu}\to n+e^+## is preferred over ##p+\bar{\nu}\to \Lambda+e^+## even setting aside phase space constraints.

Edit: changed ##\nu\to\bar{\nu}##, see below
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
But it should be ##p+\bar{\nu} \rightarrow n+ e^+##.
 
  • Care
  • Like
Likes Dr.AbeNikIanEdL and malawi_glenn
Indeed, I just copied the reactions as noted in the OP (all ##\nu## there should also be ##\bar{\nu}## but the text correctly says antineutrino).
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top