I Does antineutrino capture preferentially form neutrons?

Click For Summary
Antineutrino capture is a weak process that can change quark flavor, allowing reactions such as p+ν=n+e+ and potentially p+ν=Λ+e+ at high energies. The discussion highlights that while baryon charges match in these processes, certain reactions like p+ν=Ξ+e+ are obstructed due to quark composition. The preference for proton conversion into a neutron over conversion into a specified flavor of Λ is influenced by different CKM matrix elements, with the conclusion that p+ν→n+e+ is favored. The discussion emphasizes that energy thresholds and phase space factors play significant roles in these reactions. Overall, the preference for neutron conversion remains significant even at high energies.
snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Besides the energetic preference (lower threshold, and more phase space above)?
Antineutrino capture is a weak process, so it can and does change quark flavour.
p+ν=n+e+
is actually
uud+ν=udd+e+
that is
u+ν=d+e+
But given enough energy (like cosmic ray neutrinos), do antineutrinos also get captured:
p+ν=Λ+e+?
Because this is just
udu+ν=uds+e+
that is
u+ν=s+e+
As you see, even though baryon charges match, a process
p+ν=Ξ+e+
would be obstructed, because Ξ has 2 s quarks. But process
p+ν=Λb+e+
should be just
u+ν=b+e+

Obviously these processes are impossible below energy threshold, and above they have a phase space factor. But at high energies, does proton conversion into n vs conversion into any specified flavour of Λ approach ratio of unity, or will any difference remain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would have different CKM matrix elements in there. And ##|V_{ud}| > |V_{us}| > |V_{ub}|##. So I would say yes, ##p+\bar{\nu}\to n+e^+## is preferred over ##p+\bar{\nu}\to \Lambda+e^+## even setting aside phase space constraints.

Edit: changed ##\nu\to\bar{\nu}##, see below
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
But it should be ##p+\bar{\nu} \rightarrow n+ e^+##.
 
  • Care
  • Like
Likes Dr.AbeNikIanEdL and malawi_glenn
Indeed, I just copied the reactions as noted in the OP (all ##\nu## there should also be ##\bar{\nu}## but the text correctly says antineutrino).
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...

Similar threads