A Does anyone know asymmetric dynamic global solutions to Einstein eqs?

Heikki Tuuri
Messages
164
Reaction score
64
https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2005-6

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_solutions_in_general_relativity

http://www.numdam.org/article/SEDP_1989-1990____A15_0.pdf

A moderator removed this off-topic discussion from another thread. Does anyone on the Physics Forums have expertise on the existence of global solutions of general relativity?

As you see, people have worked very hard for 104 years to prove existence theorems. As far as I know, they are all limited to small perturbations of highly symmetric solutions.

Can anyone point to research that might have progressed closer to realistic physical configurations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heikki Tuuri said:
Can anyone point to research that might have progressed closer to realistic physical configurations?
Part of the problem (the main problem) was your personal and overly restrictive view of what constituted a realistic physical configuration. For example, you objected to the FLRW solution as being unrealistic whereas most scientists and particularly cosmologists consider it realistic.
 
Heikki Tuuri said:
As you see, people have worked very hard for 104 years to prove existence theorems. As far as I know, they are all limited to small perturbations of highly symmetric solutions.
That is not true. Global existence (as in the maximal hyperbolic Cauchy development) is a result from 1969 (Choquet-Bruhat, Geroch). What is limited is the understanding of those solutions.
Can anyone point to research that might have progressed closer to realistic physical configurations?
What do you mean by realistic physical configuration?
 
Heikki Tuuri said:
A moderator removed this off-topic discussion from another thread.

Which is completely irrelevant to this thread. Please do not carry over whatever issue you might have with the moderators in a previous thread to new threads.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top