Does AxA Equal BxB Imply A Equals B?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether the equality of Cartesian products of two sets, specifically if \( A \times A = B \times B \), implies that the sets themselves are equal, \( A = B \). Participants explore this concept from various angles, including formal proofs, intuitive reasoning, and the implications of set cardinality.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that if \( A \times A = B \times B \), then it follows that \( A = B \), based on the definition of set equality and the properties of Cartesian products.
  • Others argue that the interpretation of set equality may depend on cardinality, suggesting that equal cardinality does not necessarily imply set equality, as demonstrated by examples of sets with the same number of elements but different members.
  • A participant mentions Zermelo's theorem, noting that for infinite sets, the equality of their Cartesian products requires the Axiom of Choice, which complicates the argument.
  • Some participants clarify that if the diagonal elements of \( A \times A \) and \( B \times B \) are the same, it implies that the elements of \( A \) and \( B \) must also be the same, leading to \( A = B \).
  • Another participant emphasizes that the argument can be made trivially by showing that membership in one set leads to membership in the other, thus establishing equality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the implications of \( A \times A = B \times B \). Some participants support the idea that this equality implies \( A = B \), while others challenge this notion by discussing the role of cardinality and the conditions under which the theorem holds, particularly for infinite sets.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of set theory, particularly regarding definitions of equality and the implications of cardinality. The reliance on the Axiom of Choice in certain arguments introduces additional conditions that are not universally accepted.

Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am trying to prove a simple thing, that if AxA = BxB then A=B.

The intuition is clear to me. If a pair (x,y) belongs to AxA it means that x is in A and y is in A. If a pair (x,y) belongs to BxB it means that x is in B and y is in B. If the sets of all pairs are equal, it means that every x in A is also in B and vice versa.

How do I prove it formally ?

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
Dear all,

I am trying to prove a simple thing, that if AxA = BxB then A=B.

The intuition is clear to me. If a pair (x,y) belongs to AxA it means that x is in A and y is in A. If a pair (x,y) belongs to BxB it means that x is in B and y is in B. If the sets of all pairs are equal, it means that every x in A is also in B and vice versa.

How do I prove it formally ?

Thank you !
This may not be as simple as you think. To start with, what do you mean by saying that two sets are equal? I think that the only way to make sense of that is to interpret "A=B" to mean that A and B have the same cardinality.

If a set $A$ is finite then its cardinality is just the number of elements it contains, denoted by $|A|$. If $|A| = m$ then $|A\times A| = m^2.$ So if $|B| = n$ and $|A\times A| = |B\times B|$ then $m^2 = n^2$, from which it follows that $m=n$. This proves that if "$A\times A = B\times B$" then "$A=B$" in the case of finite sets.

For infinite sets the situation is more complicated. There is a theorem of Zermelo that if $A$ is an infinite set then $|A\times A| = |A|$. From that it follows immediately that if $|A\times A| = |B\times B|$ then $|A| = |B|$. However, the proof of Zermelo's theorem requires the Axiom of Choice. In models of set theory that do not satisfy this axiom, it may be that your result does not hold.
 
Opalg said "
I think that the only way to make sense of that is to interpret "A=B" to mean that A and B have the same
cardinality
."

I disagree. To say that sets A and B are equal means "x\in A if and only if x\in B". If two sets are equal they have the same cardinality but the converse is not true. The sets A= {1, 2, 3} and B= {a, b, c} have the same cardinality but are not equal.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Opalg said "
I think that the only way to make sense of that is to interpret "A=B" to mean that A and B have the same

cardinality
."

I disagree. To say that sets A and B are equal means "x\in A if and only if x\in B". If two sets are equal they have the same cardinality but the converse is not true. The sets A= {1, 2, 3} and B= {a, b, c} have the same cardinality but are not equal.


In that case, the result becomes trivially true. If $A\times A$ and $B\times B$ are just two different names for the same set, then the diagonal elements of $A\times A$ (those of the form $(a,a):a\in A$) are duplicates of the elements of $A$. The same holds for the diagonal elements of $B\times B$. If those diagonals are the same, it follows that the elements of $A$ are the same as the elements of $B$, so $A=B$.
 
Yes, it is. Saying that "A= B", where A and B are sets, means that if x is in A then it is also in B and if y is in B then it is also in A.

If x is a member of A. then (x, x) is in AxA= BxB so x is in B. If y is a member of B then (y, y) is in BxB= AxA so y is in A. Therefore A= B.

It is trivial but that is the question asked.
 
Yankel said:
I am trying to prove a simple thing, that if AxA = BxB then A=B.

The intuition is clear to me. If a pair (x,y) belongs to AxA it means that x is in A and y is in A. If a pair (x,y) belongs to BxB it means that x is in B and y is in B. If the sets of all pairs are equal, it means that every x in A is also in B and vice versa.

How do I prove it formally ?

Thank you !
Let $a\in A$. Then $(a,a)\in A\times A$. Since we’re assuming $A\times A=B\times B$, this means $(a,a)\in B\times B$ and thus $a\in B$. Therefore $A\subseteq B$. The same argument with $A$ and $B$ interchanged shows that $B\subseteq A$. Hence $A=B$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K