Does Back-Donation Decrease Down the Column for Cr(CO)6, Fe(CO)5, and Ni(CO)4?

  • Thread starter Thread starter plexus0208
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the back-donation phenomenon in coordination complexes, specifically Cr(CO)6, Fe(CO)5, and Ni(CO)4. It clarifies that back-donation occurs from the metal center to the CO ligand, not the reverse. The participants highlight that these complexes are not isoelectronic and possess different coordination numbers (CN), which complicates direct comparisons of backbonding. The conversation emphasizes the need to define the basis of comparison, whether per ligand or per entire complex.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of coordination chemistry
  • Familiarity with back-donation and backbonding concepts
  • Knowledge of coordination numbers (CN)
  • Basic concepts of ligand field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the back-donation mechanism in coordination complexes
  • Study the differences in coordination numbers among transition metal complexes
  • Explore ligand field theory and its implications on bonding
  • Examine the electronic structures of Cr(CO)6, Fe(CO)5, and Ni(CO)4
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in coordination chemistry, and professionals studying transition metal complexes and their bonding characteristics.

plexus0208
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Cr(CO)6
Fe(CO)5
Ni(CO)4

Is there more back-donation (from the CO) going up OR down the above column? I always get this mixed up.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Back donation is from the metal back to the ligand, not the other way as you have indicated ("from the CO").

These compounds are not isoelectronic and have different CN's. How do you want to compare the backbonding? Per ligand or per complex?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K