Does Bezout's theorem work both ways?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Heisenberg7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bezout's theorem asserts that for integers m and n, if there exist integers x and y such that mx + ny = 1, then m and n are coprime, denoted as (m, n) = 1. The discussion confirms that if (m, n) divides mx_1 + ny_1 = 1, then (m, n) must equal 1. The converse, however, is not universally true; while (m, n) = d implies there exist integers x and y such that xm + yn = d, the reverse does not hold. This property can be particularly useful in proving two integers are coprime.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bezout's theorem
  • Knowledge of integer properties and divisibility
  • Familiarity with coprime integers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Bezout's theorem in number theory
  • Explore the concept of greatest common divisor (GCD) and its properties
  • Learn about applications of coprime integers in cryptography
  • Investigate the relationship between linear combinations and integer solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in the properties of integers and their relationships.

Heisenberg7
Messages
101
Reaction score
18
Homework Statement
Below
Relevant Equations
Below
Let's assume that for integers ##m## and ##n## (and integers ##x_1## and ##y_1##) the following is satisfied: $$mx_1 + ny_1 = 1$$ Then by this theorem (for some integer ##k##), if ##k|a## and ##k|b## then ##k|mx+ny## for all integers ##x## and ##y##. So it must be, $$k | mx_1 + ny_1$$ for all common factors of ##m## and ##n##. In other words, $$k|1$$ for all common factors of ##m## and ##n##. But this implies that ##k=1## since ##k## is an integer. Thus ##(m, n) = 1##. Since I've never seen this be mentioned before, I'll be happy to see where I went wrong.

Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Made a little correction. Numbers ##x_1## and ##y_1## are integers as well.
 
By Bezout's theorem, if ##(m,n)=1## there exists ##x## and ##y## such that

\begin{align*}
mx+ny=1 .
\end{align*}

Are you asking if we can find integers ##x_1## and ##y_1## such that

\begin{align*}
mx_1+ny_1=1
\end{align*}

then is ##(m,n)=1##? In that case, ##(m,n) | mx_1+ny_1 \Rightarrow (m,n) | 1 \Rightarrow (m,n)=1##.
 
Last edited:
julian said:
By Bezout's theorem, if ##(m,n)=1## there exists ##x## and ##y## such that

\begin{align*}
mx+ny=1 .
\end{align*}

Are you asking if we can find integers ##x_1## and ##y_1## such that

\begin{align*}
mx_1+ny_1=1
\end{align*}

then is ##(m,n)=1##? In that case, ##(m,n) | mx_1+ny_1 \Rightarrow (m,n) | 1 \Rightarrow (m,n)=1##.
Yes. That's what I'm asking for. Seems like a useful property for problem solving. So, I am right?
 
It is correct. It follows trivially. As ##(m,n)## divides ##m## and ##n## by definition, and given that we have found ##x_1## and ##x_2## such that ##mx_1+ny_1=1##, we have ##(m,n) | 1##. It may be useful in proving two integers are coprime.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Heisenberg7
Also, in general ##(m,n)=d## implies ##xm+yn=d## for some integers ##x,y##. The converse is not true, though.
 
nuuskur said:
Also, in general ##(m,n)=d## implies ##xm+yn=d## for some integers ##x,y##. The converse is not true, though.
Well, in case of a prime number ##k## for which ##xm + yn = k## for some integers ##x,y,m,n##, shouldn't it be true? I mean, ##(m,n)|xm+yn \implies (m,n)|k \implies (m,n) = 1 \vee (m,n) = k##. So we only need to verify whether ##(m,n)## equals 1 or ##k##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K