Undergrad Does Conscious Observation Influence Wave Function Collapse?

Click For Summary
Scientists do not support the idea that wave function collapse requires a conscious observer; this notion is a misunderstanding of the term "observation." In quantum mechanics, observation refers to interaction with the environment rather than conscious awareness. The concept of a conscious observer influencing wave function collapse is a popular misconception. The discussion clarifies that the scientific community has consistently viewed observation in a more technical sense. Overall, the influence of consciousness on wave function collapse is not a valid scientific position.
Sayestu
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Do scientists still entertain the idea that wave function collapse requires a conscious observer?
Do scientists still entertain the idea that wave function collapse requires a conscious observer? Is it possible? Why/not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They do not. They never did.
That is a popular corruption of what they mean by observation. It really just means "interaction with its environment".
 
  • Like
Likes Fra and PeterDonis
Gotcha. Merci.
 
These papers by Pegg et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.02.003 [section 4]; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230928426_Retrodiction_in_quantum_optics [section 3.2]) seem to show that photon Bell correlations can be inferred using quantum theory in a manner that is compatible with locality by performing quantum retrodiction (i.e. inferring information about the past: e.g. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040586; more papers at end) where they evolve backward from Alice's measured outcome...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
5K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
511
Replies
7
Views
2K