Dyson's View Of Wavefunction Collapse

  • Thread starter Thread starter bhobba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum mechanics
Click For Summary
Freeman Dyson critiques the concept of wavefunction collapse in quantum mechanics, arguing that it misrepresents the wavefunction as a physical entity rather than a probabilistic description. He asserts that when an observation is made, knowledge replaces uncertainty, making the wavefunction irrelevant rather than collapsing. The discussion raises questions about the nature of physical reality and the implications of the PBR theorem, which suggests that if an objective reality exists, the wavefunction must also be part of it. Participants express confusion over the necessity of the collapse concept, suggesting it complicates rather than clarifies quantum mechanics. The conversation highlights ongoing debates about the interpretation of quantum mechanics and the role of measurement in understanding physical phenomena.
  • #91
Morbert said:
Wouldn't this require perfect resolution to be true? And perfect resolution would not be possible even in principle due to the Wigner-Araki-Yanase theorem.

Instead actual position measurements would be modeled with some POVM and yield a highly localized distribution.
Born's rule in all its textbook forms claim that measurements produce eigenvalues, and don't say anything about resolution. This shows that Born's rule is an idealization, but people talk as if it were a universal basic law. Real measurement is something quite complicated,
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and jbergman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 157 ·
6
Replies
157
Views
5K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
8K