Vibhukanishk
- 2
- 0
What to say about this?
Is the logic used in the solution supports the statement?
Is the logic used in the solution supports the statement?
The discussion centers on the validity of defining the function ##g(y)## as ##h(y)^n## in mathematical logic. Participants assert that this definition lacks justification and does not support the statement in question. Specifically, the absence of a quantifier on ##h(y)## in the initial statement is highlighted as a critical flaw. The consensus is that while the definition may hold true, it does not provide any proof or substantial argumentation.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in understanding the foundations of mathematical definitions and logical reasoning.
TeethWhitener said:No. You just asserted that ##g(y)=h(y)^n## with no justification.