Undergrad Does Defining ##g(y)## as ##h(y)^n## Validate the Statement?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vibhukanishk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the validity of defining the function ##g(y)## as ##h(y)^n## in mathematical logic. Participants assert that this definition lacks justification and does not support the statement in question. Specifically, the absence of a quantifier on ##h(y)## in the initial statement is highlighted as a critical flaw. The consensus is that while the definition may hold true, it does not provide any proof or substantial argumentation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical functions and definitions
  • Familiarity with logical quantifiers in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of exponentiation and its properties
  • Experience with formal proof techniques in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the role of quantifiers in mathematical statements
  • Explore formal proof techniques in mathematical logic
  • Learn about the implications of defining functions in mathematics
  • Investigate the properties of exponentiation in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in understanding the foundations of mathematical definitions and logical reasoning.

Vibhukanishk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What to say about this?
1659958487965.png

Is the logic used in the solution supports the statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. You just asserted that ##g(y)=h(y)^n## with no justification.
 
There is quite a bit of information missing. E.g., there is no quantifier on ##h(y)## in the initial statement.
 
TeethWhitener said:
No. You just asserted that ##g(y)=h(y)^n## with no justification.
IMG_20220808_182840.jpg
 
If you define ##g(y)## as ##h(y)^n##, then of course it's true, but there's also nothing to prove; it's all definitions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
900