Does Delta Method work for asymptotic distributions?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 2K views
FallenApple
Messages
564
Reaction score
61
So if I have a logistic regression: ##log (\hat {odds})=\hat{\beta_{0}}+\hat{\beta_{1}}x##. How would I find a confidence interval for x if I am given ##odds=5## This is going in reverse, where if I have the outcome, I try to do inference on the predictor.

We know that ##\hat{\vec{\beta}}##, the vector of ##\hat{\beta_{0}}## and ##\hat{\beta_{1}}##, is distributed asmptotically as ##N( \vec{\beta}, \hat{{Var{\hat{\beta}}}})## for large sample sizes where ##\hat{{Var{\hat{\beta}}}}## is the estimated variance covariance matrix.( similar to how ##\sigma^{2}## is estimated by ##s^{2}## for the basic t test).

So solving for x using ##log (5)=\beta_{0}+\beta_{1}x## I get: ##x( \beta_{0},\beta_{1}) =\frac{ log(5)-\beta_{0}} {\beta_{1} }## a multivariate function of both parameters.

So it seems that I would use the delta method but the one problem is the variance covariance matrix is an estimated one, so it doesn't have any actual parameters in it. Would delta method still work for this? Or would I need to try another method?
 
on Phys.org
No, that's ok. The point is that you can Taylor expand ##Var_\beta=Var_\hat{\beta}+(\partial Var_\beta/\partial \beta )(\hat{\beta}-\beta)+\ldots##.
Now ##\hat{\beta}-\beta## is of order ##1/\sqrt{N}##, so that asymptotically, you can neglect the second term.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FallenApple