Does Dust Scattering Alter the Cosmic Background Radiation Spectrum at z < 100?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter hellfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scattering
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impact of dust scattering on the cosmic background radiation (CBR) spectrum at redshifts z < 100, as analyzed in Peebles' "Principles of Physical Cosmology." Peebles concludes that while dust scattering may have altered the CBR spectrum, observational data indicates no significant changes. The findings suggest that the effects of dust scattering are highly dependent on the cosmological model used for structure formation, particularly in an Einstein-deSitter universe. The conversation highlights the need for further exploration of this topic, especially regarding the implications of different cosmological models.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cosmic background radiation (CBR)
  • Familiarity with redshift concepts in cosmology
  • Knowledge of the Einstein-deSitter universe model
  • Basic grasp of structure formation in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dust scattering on cosmic background radiation
  • Study Peebles' "Principles of Physical Cosmology," focusing on section 24
  • Examine different cosmological models for structure formation
  • Explore observational techniques for measuring anisotropies in the CBR
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and physics students interested in the effects of dust on cosmic background radiation and the implications for structure formation in the universe.

hellfire
Science Advisor
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
I was reading section 24 of Peebles "Principles of Physical Cosmology" where he analizes the impact of scattering by dust at redshifts z < 100 on the cosmic background radiation for an Einstein-deSitter universe. I was disappointed to find out that at the end of the subsection he concludes that this scattering may have changed the spectrum of the radiation, but that it obviously did not according to observations. I would have expected to have found a prediction that dust did actually not change the spectrum at high redshifts, or that such an effect did not leave an imprint in the spectrum greater than the scale of the current anisotropies. However, it seems to me that he is claiming that this depends strongly on the considered cosmological model for structure formation (see conclusions on page 597 after equation 24.95). Some discussion or some references on this would be welcome.
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Sorry for bringing up this old topic again. But I came again across Peebles section about the CBR and was wondering again about this topic. May be someone could give some hint now?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K