Does Einstein really explain everything about gravity? Is there more?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity explains gravity as the warping of spacetime, but it does not provide a definitive explanation for why mass and energy cause this warping. The gravitational effects are empirically observed rather than mathematically deduced, as noted by the stress-energy tensor, which encompasses mass, energy, momentum, pressure, and stress. The discussion highlights the philosophical limits of scientific inquiry, emphasizing that some questions, such as the fundamental reasons behind gravity, may remain unanswerable.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the stress-energy tensor
  • Basic knowledge of spacetime concepts
  • Awareness of empirical vs. a priori reasoning in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the stress-energy tensor in general relativity
  • Explore philosophical questions surrounding the nature of gravity
  • Study the mathematical foundations of spacetime curvature
  • Investigate the empirical methods used to observe gravitational effects
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, students of general relativity, and anyone interested in the fundamental questions of gravity and spacetime.

T.O.E Dream
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Although Albert Einstein had explained the new picture of gravity through his theory of general relativity, by explaining that gravity is the warping of spacetime, did he explain why mass actually warps this fabric of spacetime?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Didn't you ask this earlier?
 
T.O.E Dream said:
Although Albert Einstein had explained the new picture of gravity through his theory of general relativity, by explaining that gravity is the warping of spacetime, did he explain why mass actually warps this fabric of spacetime?

The answer to your question is no. I am not a GR expert but I have studied the theory in mathematical detail and the underlying fact that gravitational effects are caused by mass-energy seems only to be known by experience i.e. it is not deduced mathematically (a priori) but only empirically (a posteori).
 
Neither Einstein nor, as far as I know, any scientist has ever claimed to explain how mass is "causes" gravity. Newton said, in regard to that question, "Hypothesen non fengo", "I frame no hypotheses" and it is still true. That, I suspect, would be one of the deepest questions of physics.
 
cristo said:
Didn't you ask this earlier?
Yeah I did, i wanted to delete the other one first but i didn't know how and i wasn't sure if i can.
 
mass or energy creates gravity not just mass.
 
To follow up on cragar's point. The source of gravity in GR is the stress-energy tensor which includes energy (mass often being the dominant source of energy), momentum, pressure, and stress. It is incorrect to say that mass alone causes gravity.
 
cragar said:
mass or energy creates gravity not just mass.

Okay, but the question wasn't what creates gravity, the question was why does mass/energy cause spacetime to warp? On a very fundamental level.
 
T.O.E Dream said:
Okay, but the question wasn't what creates gravity, the question was why does mass/energy cause spacetime to warp? On a very fundamental level.
Define "very fundamental level". :smile: Also don't forget that curved spacetime is just a mathematical model. You could just as well ask: Why does force change the velocity of a body. The answer is: Because force is a mathematical abstraction that was defined this way.
 
  • #10
T.O.E Dream said:
Okay, but the question wasn't what creates gravity, the question was why does mass/energy cause spacetime to warp? On a very fundamental level.
Any problem in science or philosophy or anything else in life can be turned into an undending string of "why"s that eventually become unanswerable except to say "that's just the way it is". That may be unsettling to you, but it is a reality that you must deal with - scientists do and as a result, there is a limit to how far they will go with such questions. Eventually, they really are pointless. They don't add any value to scientific knowledge.
 
  • #11
By the way, TOE Dream, that is what the word "fundamental" means. If there were an answer to the question "why" then that answer would be the fundamental one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K