Does everyone here have an inferiority complex?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pdunc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the perceived obsession with attending elite universities like Ivy League and Oxbridge, with participants questioning the value of such institutions compared to less prestigious ones. Many express that personal fulfillment and practical experience are more important than the brand name of a university, suggesting that happiness and career success can be achieved through various educational paths. Concerns are raised about the elitism and snobbery associated with these prestigious schools, with some citing polls indicating dissatisfaction among students at these institutions. The conversation also highlights the differing importance of university prestige in fields like experimental versus theoretical physics, where pedigree can significantly impact recognition and opportunities. Ultimately, the thread critiques the societal pressure to pursue elite education, advocating for a broader perspective on what constitutes a successful academic and professional journey.
  • #31
Theory: Any B/C even D student can turn themselves into an A student. Evidence: me. What did it: really wanting to do it, a good textbook (either given or sought out), doing previous years exam papers following the current syllabus until I was acing them, not trusting teachers (they often don't give a ****), and learning how to learn:

Make the Most of Your Mind by Tony Buzan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Naw. If anything I have a superiority complex. I think this is the right way to go - even if it's not very realistic, it's often helpful.
 
  • #33
But the trouble is you have to be predicted an A early enough for it to count. Applying to somewhere very competitive when you're predicted Ds they're just going to ignore you even if you swear on your life you'll get an A. Being predicted a C in further maths might have been what kept me out of Oxford first time round, I actually got an A.

Jason's advice is nice in an ideal world, although in practice you don't often get much say in who your supervisor will be, at least in physics. I know someone who started a PhD very much under the impression he'd get one supervisor, and ended up with someone terrible. At least in the British system you normally apply to the research group, not the supervisor, so you could get anyone, but I do also know some people who knew early enough for it to be a factor who their supervisor would be.
 
  • #34
mal4mac said:
Theory: Any B/C even D student can turn themselves into an A student. Evidence: me. What did it: really wanting to do it, a good textbook (either given or sought out), doing previous years exam papers following the current syllabus until I was acing them, not trusting teachers (they often don't give a ****), and learning how to learn...

I definitely agree. Science teachers at the university level are known to be quite selfish. You'd be surprised how generous high school teachers and community college professors are in comparison. Many are not there just for the salary, although university professors can be.

Which is not to say that they are all bad, but that the major mistake I made as an undergraduate student was believing everything I was told; and waiting patiently for the faculty to make good on promises.

My liberal arts professors were definitely more of the order of "teacher" rather than merely a "professor," when you get down to it. I learned by going to their classes.

If you want to learn Science though, go to the labs and do your reports. Read the textbooks by yourself; make your own notes. And make an honest working schedule for yourself (do not take their advise unless you absolutely trust them).

I think the absolute best way to learn Physics is the lab and a good textbook. Always work the sample problems in the book--that was always a confidence builder for me at least!

But don't feel bad about not showing up for class, unless you are actually having an attendance issue already. Professors are always more impressed by good grades; and sometimes they can really screw you up with the mean things that they say or believe.

Happiness = success as far as I was concerned. When I was miserable because my professor in chem told me they wanted us all to fail, I did poorly. But when I got angry enough to go my own way and study alone, I did well. When I felt comfortable in my own skin around the department, I did even a little bit better.
 
  • #35
metalgirl2045 said:
But the trouble is you have to be predicted an A early enough for it to count. Applying to somewhere very competitive when you're predicted Ds they're just going to ignore you even if you swear on your life you'll get an A. Being predicted a C in further maths might have been what kept me out of Oxford first time round, I actually got an A.

Pah. There's always a way. Do the A levels, making sure you get A's (!), then apply for next year. Spend the year out writing detailed notes on Feynman's lectures on physics & Penrose's Road to Reality for 16 hours a day. Send a copy of your notes to top dogs (Hawking, Penrose, Magueijo ...)* and tell them you *really* want to study physics in their department/college. Then you only have to become a top wrangler and revolutionize physics to be the next Einstein :-)

* Read a biography of Faraday to see how (something like) this approach worked with Davy. 'Diogenes the dog' had an even more direct approach, but you don't want to frighten the horses or get arrested.:smile:
 
  • #36
pdunc said:
I truly don't mean to be beligerant, but I've been reading these (often helpful) forums and I keep seeing people trying to wrangle their way into US Ivy League or Oxbridge, and asking people to placate their fears of inadequacy.

I have some experience (a BSc) with elitist universities like these in Australia (yes, we have our own elitisms/rankings/snobbery) and must say it was a less than enjoyable 4 year stint, mainly because I was not like most of the other people who studied there.

Doesn't anyone here want to go to a decent uni, get a good degree, and follow on to a happy career? Why is everyone chasing these brand-names uni's? It saddens me a bit to think that people are pursuing these goals simply because it's expected of them.

In my experience, a first is a first and experience (voluntary or otherwise) counts for a lot more than most.

Cultural differences:

Basically compared to Australians Americans are a bunch of elitist, snobs in a society that has classes of people defined by how much money your parents had.

The kid with rich parents goes to good school while poor kid can't afford it and gets a worse job.Their minimum wage is $6 bucks an hour or so.. our is $14. Work at K-Mart here you get $21 per hour.. over there you'll get about $9 if you're lucky. Our education system is near enough to free. They just make you pay more tax until you pay your loan. The maximum we can pay is 8% of your income once it hits $120,000. They pay full and mandatory interest on their loans that can be as high as $40,00 PER YEAR for a mid range school.

The list just goes on and on and on.. if you're poor Australia is a much kinder nation. We just have a different belief system and that needs to be respected. So long as Americans aren't having a got at us for our social policies, we should leave their domestic policy well alone. I dislike so many things about that country, but it is theirs and not our right to dictate how other people should live based on our values.